Knockout LLM Assessment: Using Large Language Models for Evaluations through Iterative Pairwise Comparisons
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown to be effective evaluators across various domains such as machine translations or the scientific domain. Current LLM-as-a-Judge approaches rely mostly on individual assessments or a single round of pairwise assessments, preventing the judge LLM from developing a global ranking perspective. To address this, we present Knockout Assessment, an LLM-asa Judge method using a knockout tournament system with iterative pairwise comparisons. Experiments across three LLMs on two datasets show that knockout assessment improves scoring accuracy, increasing Pearson correlation with expert evaluations by 0.07 on average for university-level exam scoring and machine translation evaluations, aligning LLM assessments more closely with human scoring.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2025.
Builds on
6 of 11 references.
References · 6
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 734
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 422
- 2023Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Promptingcited by 307
- 2021To Ship or Not to Ship: An Extensive Evaluation of Automatic Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 163
- 2024SciEx: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Scientific Exams with Human Expert Grading and Automatic Gradingcited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.