Towards Fundamentally Scalable Model Selection: Asymptotically Fast Update and Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The advancement of deep learning technologies is bringing new models every day, motivating the study of scalable model selection. An ideal model selection scheme should minimally support two operations efficiently over a large pool of candidate models: update, which involves either adding a new candidate model or removing an existing candidate model, and selection, which involves locating highly performing models for a given task. However, previous solutions to model selection require high computational complexity for at least one of these two operations. In this work, we target fundamentally (more) scalable model selection that supports asymptotically fast update and asymptotically fast selection at the same time. Firstly, we define isolated model embedding, a family of model selection schemes supporting asymptotically fast update and selection: With respect to the number of candidate models m, the update complexity is O(1) and the selection consists of a single sweep over m vectors in addition to O(1) model operations. Isolated model embedding also implies several desirable properties for applications. Secondly, we present Standardized Embedder, an empirical realization of isolated model embedding. We assess its effectiveness by using it to select representations from a pool of 100 pre-trained vision models for classification tasks and measuring the performance gaps between the selected models and the best candidates with a linear probing protocol. Experiments suggest our realization is effective in selecting models with competitive performances and highlight isolated model embedding as a promising direction towards model selection that is fundamentally (more) scalable.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2024.
Builds on
49 of 54 references.
References · 49
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
37 more
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
- 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 1,417
- 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,215
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
- 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
- 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,127
- 2020Designing Network Design Spacescited by 954
- 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 937
- 2018Taskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learningcited by 631
- 2021CoAtNet: Marrying Convolution and Attention for All Data Sizescited by 566
- 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 562
- 2022MaxViT: Multi-Axis Vision Transformercited by 476
- 2018Bag of Tricks for Image Classification with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 430
- 2019GhostNet: More Features from Cheap Operationscited by 410
- 2021When Vision Transformers Outperform ResNets without Pre-training or Strong Data Augmentationscited by 259
- 2019Task2Vec: Task Embedding for Meta-Learningcited by 197
- 2020LEEP: A New Measure to Evaluate Transferability of Learned Representationscited by 182
- 2023EfficientViT: Memory Efficient Vision Transformer with Cascaded Group Attentioncited by 172
- 2021LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer Learningcited by 168
- 2021On Feature Decorrelation in Self-Supervised Learningcited by 160
- 2022MobileOne: An Improved One millisecond Mobile Backbonecited by 109
- 2024Deconstructing Denoising Diffusion Models for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 89
- 2023InceptionNeXt: When Inception Meets ConvNeXtcited by 84
- 2022An Information-Theoretic Approach to Transferability in Task Transfer Learningcited by 79
- 2018Towards Understanding Learning Representations: To What Extent Do Different Neural Networks Learn the Same Representationcited by 62
- 2021Transferability Estimation using Bhattacharyya Class Separabilitycited by 53
- 2021Frustratingly Easy Transferability Estimationcited by 44
- 2022GhostNetV2: Enhance Cheap Operation with Long-Range Attentioncited by 44
- 2021Scalable Diverse Model Selection for Accessible Transfer Learningcited by 40
- 2022How stable are Transferability Metrics evaluations?cited by 30
- 2022RepGhost: A Hardware-Efficient Ghost Module via Re-parameterizationcited by 13
- 2023Temporal Robustness against Data Poisoningcited by 10
- 2022Efficiently Tuned Parameters are Task Embeddingscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.