mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Rethinking the impact of noisy labels in graph classification: A utility and privacy perspective

arXiv 2406.07314 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2024cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph neural networks based on message-passing mechanisms have achieved advanced results in graph classification tasks. However, their generalization performance degrades when noisy labels are present in the training data. Most existing noisy labeling approaches focus on the visual domain or graph node classification tasks and analyze the impact of noisy labels only from a utility perspective. Unlike existing work, in this paper, we measure the effects of noise labels on graph classification from data privacy and model utility perspectives. We find that noise labels degrade the model's generalization performance and enhance the ability of membership inference attacks on graph data privacy. To this end, we propose the robust graph neural network approach with noisy labeled graph classification. Specifically, we first accurately filter the noisy samples by high-confidence samples and the first feature principal component vector of each class. Then, the robust principal component vectors and the model output under data augmentation are utilized to achieve noise label correction guided by dual spatial information. Finally, supervised graph contrastive learning is introduced to enhance the embedding quality of the model and protect the privacy of the training graph data. The utility and privacy of the proposed method are validated by comparing twelve different methods on eight real graph classification datasets. Compared with the state-of-the-art methods, the RGLC method achieves at most and at least 7.8% and 0.8% performance gain at 30% noisy labeling rate, respectively, and reduces the accuracy of privacy attacks to below 60%.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2024.

Builds on

40 of 71 references.

References · 40

  1. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  3. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
  4. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
  5. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  6. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
  7. 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,203
  8. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  9. 2018Hierarchical Graph Representation Learning with Differentiable Poolingcited by 786
  10. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  11. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
  12. 2022SimGRACE: A Simple Framework for Graph Contrastive Learning without Data Augmentationcited by 171
28 more
  1. 2019Privacy Risks of Securing Machine Learning Models against Adversarial Examplescited by 136
  2. 2021Deep Learning with Label Differential Privacycited by 113
  3. 2019Wasserstein Weisfeiler-Lehman Graph Kernelscited by 104
  4. 2022Truth Serum: Poisoning Machine Learning Models to Reveal Their Secretscited by 94
  5. 2022Membership Inference Attacks by Exploiting Loss Trajectorycited by 93
  6. 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
  7. 2022UNICON: Combating Label Noise Through Uniform Selection and Contrastive Learningcited by 77
  8. 2021Generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence Loss for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 74
  9. 2021NRGNN: Learning a Label Noise-Resistant Graph Neural Network on Sparsely and Noisily Labeled Graphscited by 73
  10. 2019Robust Inference via Generative Classifiers for Handling Noisy Labelscited by 67
  11. 2022Plug & Play Attacks: Towards Robust and Flexible Model Inversion Attackscited by 58
  12. 2021Model Stealing Attacks Against Inductive Graph Neural Networkscited by 50
  13. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels via Sparse Regularizationcited by 38
  14. 2022Amplifying Membership Exposure via Data Poisoningcited by 29
  15. 2022Robust Training of Graph Neural Networks via Noise Governancecited by 29
  16. 2023Learning on Graphs under Label Noisecited by 22
  17. 2021Theoretically Improving Graph Neural Networks via Anonymous Walk Graph Kernelscited by 19
  18. 2023TGNN: A Joint Semi-supervised Framework for Graph-level Classificationcited by 19
  19. 2023On Strengthening and Defending Graph Reconstruction Attack with Markov Chain Approximationcited by 16
  20. 2023Towards Semi-supervised Universal Graph Classificationcited by 15
  21. 2021Federated Noisy Client Learningcited by 13
  22. 2023Resurrecting Label Propagation for Graphs with Heterophily and Label Noisecited by 12
  23. 2023ALEX: Towards Effective Graph Transfer Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 11
  24. 2023ERASE: Error-Resilient Representation Learning on Graphs for Label Noise Tolerancecited by 11
  25. 2023Combating Bilateral Edge Noise for Robust Link Predictioncited by 9
  26. 2022Generating Simple Directed Social Network Graphs for Information Spreadingcited by 8
  27. 2022Robust Point Cloud Segmentation with Noisy Annotationscited by 6
  28. 2022Label Efficient Regularization and Propagation for Graph Node Classificationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5.

5 papers.