PAC-Bayes Analysis for Recalibration in Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Nonparametric estimation using uniform-width binning is a standard approach for evaluating the calibration performance of machine learning models. However, existing theoretical analyses of the bias induced by binning are limited to binary classification, creating a significant gap with practical applications such as multiclass classification. Additionally, many parametric recalibration algorithms lack theoretical guarantees for their generalization performance. To address these issues, we conduct a generalization analysis of calibration error using the probably approximately correct Bayes framework. This approach enables us to derive the first optimizable upper bound for generalization error in the calibration context. On the basis of our theory, we propose a generalization-aware recalibration algorithm. Numerical experiments show that our algorithm enhances the performance of Gaussian process-based recalibration across various benchmark datasets and models.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2024.
Builds on
25 of 47 references.
References · 25
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
- 2019Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find Themcited by 507
- 2018Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathologycited by 420
- 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 307
- 2017Information-theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithmscited by 299
- 2015DeepDriving: Learning Affordance for Direct Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 229
- 2020Mix-n-Match: Ensemble and Compositional Methods for Uncertainty Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 190
- 2015On the properties of variational approximations of Gibbs posteriorscited by 121
13 more
- 2020Mitigating Bias in Calibration Error Estimationcited by 100
- 2023How Does Information Bottleneck Help Deep Learning?cited by 92
- 2020Distribution-free binary classification: prediction sets, confidence intervals and calibrationcited by 79
- 2022Better Uncertainty Calibration via Proper Scores for Classification and Beyondcited by 65
- 2019Non-Parametric Calibration for Classificationcited by 57
- 2021Distribution-free calibration guarantees for histogram binning without sample splittingcited by 44
- 2022A Consistent and Differentiable Lp Canonical Calibration Error Estimatorcited by 44
- 2021How Tight Can PAC-Bayes be in the Small Data Regime?cited by 24
- 2022Calibration tests beyond classificationcited by 20
- 2023Minimum-Risk Recalibration of Classifierscited by 10
- 2024Information-theoretic Generalization Analysis for Expected Calibration Errorcited by 9
- 2023PAC-Bayes Generalization Certificates for Learned Inductive Conformal Predictioncited by 6
- 2014PAC-Bayesian AUC classification and scoringcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.