mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A conversion theorem and minimax optimality for continuum contextual bandits

arXiv 2406.05714 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2024stat.ML cs.LG math.STcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the contextual continuum bandits problem, where the learner sequentially receives a side information vector and has to choose an action in a convex set, minimizing a function associated with the context. The goal is to minimize all the underlying functions for the received contexts, leading to the contextual notion of regret, which is stronger than the standard static regret. Assuming that the objective functions are γ-H"older with respect to the contexts, 0<γ≤ 1, we demonstrate that any algorithm achieving a sub-linear static regret can be extended to achieve a sub-linear contextual regret. We prove a static-to-contextual regret conversion theorem that provides an upper bound for the contextual regret of the output algorithm as a function of the static regret of the input algorithm. We further study the implications of this general result for three fundamental cases of dependency of the objective function on the action variable: (a) Lipschitz bandits, (b) convex bandits, (c) strongly convex and smooth bandits. For Lipschitz bandits and γ=1, combining our results with the lower bound of Slivkins (2014), we prove that the minimax optimal contextual regret for the noise-free adversarial setting is achieved. Then, we prove that in the presence of noise, the contextual regret rate as a function of the number of queries is the same for convex bandits as it is for strongly convex and smooth bandits. Lastly, we present a minimax lower bound, implying two key facts. First, obtaining a sub-linear contextual regret may be impossible over functions that are not continuous with respect to the context. Second, for convex bandits and strongly convex and smooth bandits, the algorithms that we propose achieve, up to a logarithmic factor, the minimax optimal rate of contextual regret as a function of the number of queries.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2024.

Builds on

18 of 53 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 407
  2. 2021Non-stationary Reinforcement Learning without Prior Knowledge: An Optimal Black-box Approachcited by 98
  3. 2019A New Algorithm for Non-stationary Contextual Bandits: Efficient, Optimal, and Parameter-freecited by 71
  4. 2016Tracking Slowly Moving Clairvoyant: Optimal Dynamic Regret of Online Learning with True and Noisy Gradientcited by 65
  5. 2016Kernel-based methods for bandit convex optimizationcited by 63
  6. 2017Efficient Contextual Bandits in Non-stationary Worldscited by 62
  7. 2019Bandit Convex Optimization in Non-stationary Environmentscited by 41
  8. 2023Foundations of Reinforcement Learning and Interactive Decision Makingcited by 33
  9. 2017Bandit Convex Optimization for Scalable and Dynamic IoT Managementcited by 24
  10. 2022Multi-task Representation Learning with Stochastic Linear Banditscited by 20
  11. 2024Bandit Convex Optimisationcited by 18
  12. 2020Exploiting Higher Order Smoothness in Derivative-free Optimization and Continuous Banditscited by 17
6 more
  1. 2014The entropic barrier: a simple and optimal universal self-concordant barriercited by 15
  2. 2023Gradient-free optimization of highly smooth functions: improved analysis and a new algorithmcited by 12
  3. 2022On Adaptivity in Non-stationary Stochastic Optimization With Bandit Feedbackcited by 11
  4. 2022Meta Representation Learning with Contextual Linear Banditscited by 6
  5. 2017An homotopy method for ℓp regression provably beyond self-concordance and in input-sparsity timecited by 4
  6. 2019A Dimension-free Algorithm for Contextual Continuum-armed Banditscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.