On Adaptivity in Non-stationary Stochastic Optimization With Bandit Feedback
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper we study the non-stationary stochastic optimization question with bandit feedback and dynamic regret measures. The seminal work of Besbes et al. (2015) shows that, when aggregated function changes is known a priori, a simple re-starting algorithm attains the optimal dynamic regret. In this work, we designed a stochastic optimization algorithm with fixed step sizes, which combined together with the multi-scale sampling framework of Wei and Luo (2021) achieves the optimal dynamic regret in non-stationary stochastic optimization without requiring prior knowledge of function change budget, thereby closes a question that has been open for a while. We also establish an additional result showing that any algorithm achieving good regret against stationary benchmarks with high probability could be automatically converted to an algorithm that achieves good regret against dynamic benchmarks, which is applicable to a wide class of bandit convex optimization algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2022.
Builds on
10 of 25 references.
References · 10
- 2013Non-stationary Stochastic Optimizationcited by 175
- 2021Non-stationary Reinforcement Learning without Prior Knowledge: An Optimal Black-box Approachcited by 98
- 2020Dynamic Regret of Convex and Smooth Functionscited by 90
- 2016Kernel-based methods for bandit convex optimizationcited by 63
- 2017Stochastic Zeroth-order Optimization in High Dimensionscited by 63
- 2019Hedging the Drift: Learning to Optimize under Non-Stationaritycited by 46
- 2020Improved Regret for Zeroth-Order Adversarial Bandit Convex Optimisationcited by 33
- 2021Non-stationary Online Learning with Memory and Non-stochastic Controlcited by 33
- 2020Minimizing Dynamic Regret and Adaptive Regret Simultaneouslycited by 31
- 2022Optimal Dynamic Regret in Proper Online Learning with Strongly Convex Losses and Beyondcited by 28
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 6.
11 papers.
- 2023A Stability Principle for Learning under Non-Stationaritycited by 10
- 2024Lower Bounds for Time-Varying Kernelized Banditscited by 5
- 2025Non-Stationary Lipschitz Banditscited by 3
- 2025Non-stationary Bandit Convex Optimization: A Comprehensive Studycited by 1
- 2026Achieving Optimal Static and Dynamic Regret Simultaneously in Bandits with Deterministic Lossescited by 1
- 2024A conversion theorem and minimax optimality for continuum contextual banditscited by 0
- 2026Active Sensing Subserves Task-Level Controlcited by 0
- 2026Dynamic Regret for Non-Stationary Linear Bandits via Misspecification Reductionscited by 0
- 2026Experimentation and Commitment under Reward Shiftscited by 0
- 2026On Non-Stationary Dynamic Pricing: Adaptivity and Optimalitycited by 0
- 2026Toward Optimal Switching Regret for Multi-Armed Bandits with Oblivious Adversarycited by 0
- 2026Toward Optimal Switching Regret for Multi-Armed Bandits with Oblivious Adversary11 Sep 2026
- 2026On Non-Stationary Dynamic Pricing: Adaptivity and Optimality27 Jul 2026
- 2026Experimentation and Commitment under Reward Shifts26 Jul 2026
- 2026Dynamic Regret for Non-Stationary Linear Bandits via Misspecification Reductions3 Jul 2026
- 2026Active Sensing Subserves Task-Level Control21 May 2026
- 2026Achieving Optimal Static and Dynamic Regret Simultaneously in Bandits with Deterministic Losses7 Feb 2026
- 2025Non-stationary Bandit Convex Optimization: A Comprehensive Study3 Jun 2025
- 2025Non-Stationary Lipschitz Bandits24 May 2025
- 2024Lower Bounds for Time-Varying Kernelized Bandits22 Oct 2024
- 2024A conversion theorem and minimax optimality for continuum contextual bandits9 Jun 2024
- 2023A Stability Principle for Learning under Non-Stationarity27 Oct 2023