mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Should you use a probabilistic duration model in TTS? Probably! Especially for spontaneous speech

arXiv 2406.05401 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2024eess.AS cs.HC cs.SDcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Converting input symbols to output audio in TTS requires modelling the durations of speech sounds. Leading non-autoregressive (NAR) TTS models treat duration modelling as a regression problem. The same utterance is then spoken with identical timings every time, unlike when a human speaks. Probabilistic models of duration have been proposed, but there is mixed evidence of their benefits. However, prior studies generally only consider speech read aloud, and ignore spontaneous speech, despite the latter being both a more common and a more variable mode of speaking. We compare the effect of conventional deterministic duration modelling to durations sampled from a powerful probabilistic model based on conditional flow matching (OT-CFM), in three different NAR TTS approaches: regression-based, deep generative, and end-to-end. Across four different corpora, stochastic duration modelling improves probabilistic NAR TTS approaches, especially for spontaneous speech. Please see https://shivammehta25.github.io/prob_dur/ for audio and resources.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Total-Duration-Aware Duration Modeling for Text-to-Speech Systems
  2. 2026dots.tts Technical Report
  3. 2021AdaSpeech 3: Adaptive Text to Speech for Spontaneous Style
  4. 2023Matcha-TTS: A fast TTS architecture with conditional flow matching
  5. 2024Beyond Oversmoothing: Evaluating DDPM and MSE for Scalable Speech Synthesis in ASR
  6. 2024SimpleSpeech 2: Towards Simple and Efficient Text-to-Speech with Flow-based Scalar Latent Transformer Diffusion Models
  7. 2023Comparing normalizing flows and diffusion models for prosody and acoustic modelling in text-to-speech
  8. 2026TLDR: Compressing Audio Tokens for Efficient Autoregressive Text-to-Speech