What Should Embeddings Embed? Autoregressive Models Represent Latent Generating Distributions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autoregressive language models have demonstrated a remarkable ability to extract latent structure from text. The embeddings from large language models have been shown to capture aspects of the syntax and semantics of language. But what should embeddings represent? We connect the autoregressive prediction objective to the idea of constructing predictive sufficient statistics to summarize the information contained in a sequence of observations, and use this connection to identify three settings where the optimal content of embeddings can be identified: independent identically distributed data, where the embedding should capture the sufficient statistics of the data; latent state models, where the embedding should encode the posterior distribution over states given the data; and discrete hypothesis spaces, where the embedding should reflect the posterior distribution over hypotheses given the data. We then conduct empirical probing studies to show that transformers encode these three kinds of latent generating distributions, and that they perform well in out-of-distribution cases and without token memorization in these settings.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2024.
Builds on
32 of 60 references.
References · 32
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2021An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inferencecited by 915
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 822
- 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 807
- 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 793
- 2022What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function Classescited by 700
- 2022What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear modelscited by 671
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
20 more
- 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 436
- 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 382
- 2021Transformers Can Do Bayesian Inferencecited by 338
- 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
- 2021Implicit Representations of Meaning in Neural Language Modelscited by 179
- 2023Embers of Autoregression: Understanding Large Language Models Through the Problem They are Trained to Solvecited by 175
- 2017What do Neural Machine Translation Models Learn about Morphology?cited by 165
- 2017Learning to Generate Reviews and Discovering Sentimentcited by 147
- 2022Language Models as Agent Modelscited by 131
- 2019Open Sesame: Getting Inside BERT's Linguistic Knowledgecited by 119
- 2018Under the Hood: Using Diagnostic Classifiers to Investigate and Improve how Language Models Track Agreement Informationcited by 97
- 2023How Do Transformers Learn Topic Structure: Towards a Mechanistic Understandingcited by 85
- 2023In-Context Learning through the Bayesian Prismcited by 78
- 2024Transformers represent belief state geometry in their residual streamcited by 73
- 2023Modeling rapid language learning by distilling Bayesian priors into artificial neural networkscited by 40
- 2020Meta-trained agents implement Bayes-optimal agentscited by 37
- 2022Topic Discovery via Latent Space Clustering of Pretrained Language Model Representationscited by 34
- 2018BRUNO: A Deep Recurrent Model for Exchangeable Datacited by 11
- 2022Probing BERT's priors with serial reproduction chainscited by 11
- 2023Revisiting Topic-Guided Language Modelscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 5.
10 papers.
- 2024BEEAR: Embedding-based Adversarial Removal of Safety Backdoors in Instruction-tuned Language Modelscited by 50
- 2025Creating General User Models from Computer Usecited by 44
- 2025Levels of Analysis for Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2025Towards Strategic Persuasion with Language Modelscited by 7
- 2026Ventriloquist LLMs: Linear Alignment of Late-Stage Representationscited by 3
- 2026Simulated Annealing Enhances Theory-of-Mind Reasoning in Autoregressive Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025Hyperdimensional Probe: Decoding LLM Representations via Vector Symbolic Architecturescited by 1
- 2026Predictive Statistics Shape Emergent World Representations of Grid Walkerscited by 0
- 2026Characterizing Rhetorical Misalignment in Decision-Making with Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Learning What to Forget: Distributional Unlearning for LLM Representation Spacescited by 0
- 2026Learning What to Forget: Distributional Unlearning for LLM Representation Spaces30 Sep 2026
- 2026Characterizing Rhetorical Misalignment in Decision-Making with Language Models24 Jul 2026
- 2026Ventriloquist LLMs: Linear Alignment of Late-Stage Representations19 Mar 2026
- 2026Predictive Statistics Shape Emergent World Representations of Grid Walkers17 Mar 2026
- 2026Simulated Annealing Enhances Theory-of-Mind Reasoning in Autoregressive Language Models18 Jan 2026
- 2025Hyperdimensional Probe: Decoding LLM Representations via Vector Symbolic Architectures29 Sep 2025
- 2025Towards Strategic Persuasion with Language Models26 Sep 2025
- 2025Creating General User Models from Computer Use16 May 2025
- 2025Levels of Analysis for Large Language Models17 Mar 2025
- 2024BEEAR: Embedding-based Adversarial Removal of Safety Backdoors in Instruction-tuned Language Models24 Jun 2024