Simulated Annealing Enhances Theory-of-Mind Reasoning in Autoregressive Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Autoregressive language models are next-token predictors and have been criticized for only optimizing surface plausibility (i.e., local coherence) rather than maintaining correct latent-state representations (i.e., global coherence). Because Theory of Mind (ToM) tasks crucially depend on reasoning about latent mental states of oneself and others, such models are therefore often thought to fail at ToM. While post-training methods can improve ToM performance, we show that strong ToM capability can be recovered directly from the base model without any additional weight updates or verifications. Our approach builds on recent power-sampling methods (Karan & Du, 2025) that use Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) to sample from sharpened sequence-level (rather than token-level) probability distributions of autoregressive language models. We further find that incorporating annealing, where the tempered distribution is gradually shifted from high to low temperature, substantially improves ToM performance over fixed-temperature power sampling. Together, these results suggest that sampling-based optimization provides a powerful way to extract latent capabilities from language models without retraining.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 18 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2026.
Builds on
18 of 35 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Do LLMs Exhibit Human-Like Reasoning? Evaluating Theory of Mind in LLMs for Open-Ended Responses9 Jun
- 2023From Word Models to World Models: Translating from Natural Language to the Probabilistic Language of Thought22 Jun
- 2023Understanding Social Reasoning in Language Models with Language Models21 Jun
Other references · 15
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
- 2018World Modelscited by 1,444
- 2023The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"cited by 399
- 2023Large Language Models Fail on Trivial Alterations to Theory-of-Mind Taskscited by 288
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Taskscited by 217
- 2024Recursive Introspection: Teaching Language Model Agents How to Self-Improvecited by 162
- 2025Reasoning with Sampling: Your Base Model is Smarter Than You Thinkcited by 84
- 2023How FaR Are Large Language Models From Agents with Theory-of-Mind?cited by 75
- 2024Incoherent Probability Judgments in Large Language Modelscited by 29
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Do Theory of Mind Benchmarks Need Explicit Human-like Reasoning in Language Models?
- 2026Reasoning with Latent Tokens in Diffusion Language Models
- 2025Decompose-ToM: Enhancing Theory of Mind Reasoning in Large Language Models through Simulation and Task Decomposition
- 2026Sample Where You Struggle: Sharpening Base Model Reasoning via Entropy-Guided Power Sampling
- 2025Sensitivity Meets Sparsity: The Impact of Extremely Sparse Parameter Patterns on Theory-of-Mind of Large Language Models
- 2026Evaluating Theory of Mind in Reasoning Models: Robustness over Reasoning
- 2023MindGames: Targeting Theory of Mind in Large Language Models with Dynamic Epistemic Modal Logic
- 2024When a language model is optimized for reasoning, does it still show embers of autoregression? An analysis of OpenAI o1