Distributional Adversarial Loss
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We initiate the study of a new notion of adversarial loss which we call distributional adversarial loss. In this notion, we assume for each original example, the allowed adversarial perturbation set is a family of distributions, and the adversarial loss over each example is the maximum loss over all the associated distributions. The goal is to minimize the overall adversarial loss. We show sample complexity bounds in the PAC-learning setting for our notion of adversarial loss. Our notion of adversarial loss contrasts the prior work on robust learning that considers a set of points, not distributions, as the perturbation set of each clean example. As an application of our approach, we show how to unify the two lines of work on randomized smoothing and robust learning in the PAC-learning setting and derive sample complexity bounds for randomized smoothing methods. Furthermore, we investigate the role of randomness in achieving robustness against adversarial attacks. We show a general derandomization technique that preserves the extent of a randomized classifier's robustness against adversarial attacks and show its effectiveness empirically.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2024.
Builds on
21 of 35 references.
References · 21
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
- 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
- 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 328
- 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 322
- 2018Certified Defenses against Adversarial Examplescited by 305
9 more
- 2020MACER: Attack-free and Scalable Robust Training via Maximizing Certified Radiuscited by 114
- 2021Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World Attackscited by 101
- 2019VC Classes are Adversarially Robustly Learnable, but Only Improperlycited by 83
- 2018On the Robustness of the CVPR 2018 White-Box Adversarial Example Defensescited by 40
- 2021Improved, Deterministic Smoothing for L_1 Certified Robustnesscited by 39
- 2020Higher-Order Certification for Randomized Smoothingcited by 36
- 2018Improved Generalization Bounds for Adversarially Robust Learningcited by 22
- 2022Adversarially Robust Learning: A Generic Minimax Optimal Learner and Characterizationcited by 17
- 2018Towards Understanding Limitations of Pixel Discretization Against Adversarial Attackscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.