mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Understanding Limitations of Pixel Discretization Against Adversarial Attacks

arXiv 1805.07816 ↗First posted 20 May 2018cs.CR cs.LG cs.NEcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Wide adoption of artificial neural networks in various domains has led to an increasing interest in defending adversarial attacks against them. Preprocessing defense methods such as pixel discretization are particularly attractive in practice due to their simplicity, low computational overhead, and applicability to various systems. It is observed that such methods work well on simple datasets like MNIST, but break on more complicated ones like ImageNet under recently proposed strong white-box attacks. To understand the conditions for success and potentials for improvement, we study the pixel discretization defense method, including more sophisticated variants that take into account the properties of the dataset being discretized. Our results again show poor resistance against the strong attacks. We analyze our results in a theoretical framework and offer strong evidence that pixel discretization is unlikely to work on all but the simplest of the datasets. Furthermore, our arguments present insights why some other preprocessing defenses may be insecure.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 May 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

3 papers.