mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Less is More: Pseudo-Label Filtering for Continual Test-Time Adaptation

arXiv 2406.02609 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Continual Test-Time Adaptation (CTTA) aims to adapt a pre-trained model to a sequence of target domains during the test phase without accessing the source data. To adapt to unlabeled data from unknown domains, existing methods rely on constructing pseudo-labels for all samples and updating the model through self-training. However, these pseudo-labels often involve noise, leading to insufficient adaptation. To improve the quality of pseudo-labels, we propose a pseudo-label selection method for CTTA, called Pseudo Labeling Filter (PLF). The key idea of PLF is to keep selecting appropriate thresholds for pseudo-labels and identify reliable ones for self-training. Specifically, we present three principles for setting thresholds during continuous domain learning, including initialization, growth and diversity. Based on these principles, we design Self-Adaptive Thresholding to filter pseudo-labels. Additionally, we introduce a Class Prior Alignment (CPA) method to encourage the model to make diverse predictions for unknown domain samples. Through extensive experiments, PLF outperforms current state-of-the-art methods, proving its effectiveness in CTTA.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2024.

Builds on

24 of 48 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  2. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
  3. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  4. 2013Domain Generalization via Invariant Feature Representationcited by 622
  5. 2017Mean teachers are better role models: Weight-averaged consistency targets improve semi-supervised deep learning resultscited by 470
  6. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
  7. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
  8. 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
  9. 2016Revisiting Batch Normalization For Practical Domain Adaptationcited by 285
  10. 2022FreeMatch: Self-adaptive Thresholding for Semi-supervised Learningcited by 232
  11. 2024SuRe: Summarizing Retrievals using Answer Candidates for Open-domain QA of LLMscited by 67
  12. 2021MT3: Meta Test-Time Training for Self-Supervised Test-Time Adaptioncited by 65
12 more
  1. 2020Tent: Fully Test-time Adaptation by Entropy Minimizationcited by 59
  2. 2019Test-Time Training with Self-Supervision for Generalization under Distribution Shiftscited by 55
  3. 2023IEBins: Iterative Elastic Bins for Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 53
  4. 2022Exploring Example Influence in Continual Learningcited by 44
  5. 2021Sinkhorn Label Allocation: Semi-Supervised Classification via Annealed Self-Trainingcited by 32
  6. 2023Switching Temporary Teachers for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 23
  7. 2024Commonsense Prototype for Outdoor Unsupervised 3D Object Detectioncited by 13
  8. 2023PG-LBO: Enhancing High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization with Pseudo-Label and Gaussian Process Guidancecited by 9
  9. 2022TTAPS: Test-Time Adaption by Aligning Prototypes using Self-Supervisioncited by 8
  10. 2024PALM: Pushing Adaptive Learning Rate Mechanisms for Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 8
  11. 2024DomainVerse: A Benchmark Towards Real-World Distribution Shifts For Tuning-Free Adaptive Domain Generalizationcited by 3
  12. 2023Geometric Data Augmentations to Mitigate Distribution Shifts in Pollen Classification from Microscopic Imagescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.