PALM: Pushing Adaptive Learning Rate Mechanisms for Continual Test-Time Adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Real-world vision models in dynamic environments face rapid shifts in domain distributions, leading to decreased recognition performance. Using unlabeled test data, continuous test-time adaptation (CTTA) directly adjusts a pre-trained source discriminative model to these changing domains. A highly effective CTTA method involves applying layer-wise adaptive learning rates for selectively adapting pre-trained layers. However, it suffers from the poor estimation of domain shift and the inaccuracies arising from the pseudo-labels. This work aims to overcome these limitations by identifying layers for adaptation via quantifying model prediction uncertainty without relying on pseudo-labels. We utilize the magnitude of gradients as a metric, calculated by backpropagating the KL divergence between the softmax output and a uniform distribution, to select layers for further adaptation. Subsequently, for the parameters exclusively belonging to these selected layers, with the remaining ones frozen, we evaluate their sensitivity to approximate the domain shift and adjust their learning rates accordingly. We conduct extensive image classification experiments on CIFAR-10C, CIFAR-100C, and ImageNet-C, demonstrating the superior efficacy of our method compared to prior approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2024.
Builds on
32 of 45 references.
References · 32
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,546
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
- 2018Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 905
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
- 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 541
- 2017Large Batch Training of Convolutional Networkscited by 535
20 more
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 525
- 2018Progress & Compress: A scalable framework for continual learningcited by 520
- 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
- 2017ThiNet: A Filter Level Pruning Method for Deep Neural Network Compressioncited by 442
- 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 431
- 2016Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Residual Transfer Networkscited by 341
- 2021On the Importance of Gradients for Detecting Distributional Shifts in the Wildcited by 339
- 2017Empirical Analysis of the Hessian of Over-Parametrized Neural Networkscited by 290
- 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 261
- 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
- 2018SpotTune: Transfer Learning through Adaptive Fine-tuningcited by 168
- 2023Prodigy: An Expeditiously Adaptive Parameter-Free Learnercited by 133
- 2023EcoTTA: Memory-Efficient Continual Test-time Adaptation via Self-distilled Regularizationcited by 123
- 2022Robust Mean Teacher for Continual and Gradual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 104
- 2018Faster gaze prediction with dense networks and Fisher pruningcited by 94
- 2019Are All Layers Created Equal?cited by 94
- 2019The intriguing role of module criticality in the generalization of deep networkscited by 40
- 2023Continual Test-time Domain Adaptation via Dynamic Sample Selectioncited by 35
- 2022No Parameters Left Behind: Sensitivity Guided Adaptive Learning Rate for Training Large Transformer Modelscited by 15
- 2023Layer-wise Auto-Weighting for Non-Stationary Test-Time Adaptationcited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.
8 papers.
- 2026When and Where to Reset Matters for Long-Term Test-Time Adaptationcited by 4
- 2025Class-aware Domain Knowledge Fusion and Fission for Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 3
- 2024Less is More: Pseudo-Label Filtering for Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 1
- 2026Audio-Visual Continual Test-Time Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 1
- 2026Continual Test-Time Adaptation in Computer Vision: Methods, Benchmarks, and Future Directionscited by 1
- 2025DCFS: Continual Test-Time Adaptation via Dual Consistency of Feature and Samplecited by 0
- 2025SloMo-Fast: Slow-Momentum and Fast-Adaptive Teachers for Source-Free Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 0
- 2026BP-TTA: Balanced and Prototype-Guided Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 0
- 2026Continual Test-Time Adaptation in Computer Vision: Methods, Benchmarks, and Future Directions9 Jul 2026
- 2026BP-TTA: Balanced and Prototype-Guided Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarios30 Jun 2026
- 2026When and Where to Reset Matters for Long-Term Test-Time Adaptation4 Mar 2026
- 2026Audio-Visual Continual Test-Time Adaptation without Forgetting20 Feb 2026
- 2025SloMo-Fast: Slow-Momentum and Fast-Adaptive Teachers for Source-Free Continual Test-Time Adaptation23 Nov 2025
- 2025Class-aware Domain Knowledge Fusion and Fission for Continual Test-Time Adaptation14 Oct 2025
- 2025DCFS: Continual Test-Time Adaptation via Dual Consistency of Feature and Sample28 Aug 2025
- 2024Less is More: Pseudo-Label Filtering for Continual Test-Time Adaptation3 Jun 2024