mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Unifying Framework for Action-Conditional Self-Predictive Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2406.02035 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning a good representation is a crucial challenge for Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents. Self-predictive learning provides means to jointly learn a latent representation and dynamics model by bootstrapping from future latent representations (BYOL). Recent work has developed theoretical insights into these algorithms by studying a continuous-time ODE model for self-predictive representation learning under the simplifying assumption that the algorithm depends on a fixed policy (BYOL-Pi); this assumption is at odds with practical instantiations of such algorithms, which explicitly condition their predictions on future actions. In this work, we take a step towards bridging the gap between theory and practice by analyzing an action-conditional self-predictive objective (BYOL-AC) using the ODE framework, characterizing its convergence properties and highlighting important distinctions between the limiting solutions of the BYOL-Pi and BYOL-AC dynamics. We show how the two representations are related by a variance equation. This connection leads to a novel variance-like action-conditional objective (BYOL-VAR) and its corresponding ODE. We unify the study of all three objectives through two complementary lenses; a model-based perspective, where each objective is shown to be equivalent to a low-rank approximation of certain dynamics, and a model-free perspective, which establishes relationships between the objectives and their respective value, Q-value, and advantage function. Our empirical investigations, encompassing both linear function approximation and Deep RL environments, demonstrates that BYOL-AC is better overall in a variety of different settings.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2024.

Builds on

18 of 33 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  2. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
  3. 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,327
  4. 2016Reinforcement Learning with Unsupervised Auxiliary Taskscited by 400
  5. 2023Minigrid & Miniworld: Modular & Customizable Reinforcement Learning Environments for Goal-Oriented Taskscited by 320
  6. 2020Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Self-Predictive Representationscited by 309
  7. 2015Action-Conditional Video Prediction using Deep Networks in Atari Gamescited by 171
  8. 2020Predicting What You Already Know Helps: Provable Self-Supervised Learningcited by 152
  9. 2020Bootstrap Latent-Predictive Representations for Multitask Reinforcement Learningcited by 101
  10. 2017Eigenoption Discovery through the Deep Successor Representationcited by 85
  11. 2019V-MPO: On-Policy Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimization for Discrete and Continuous Controlcited by 85
  12. 2022BYOL-Explore: Exploration by Bootstrapped Predictioncited by 71
6 more
  1. 2021On The Effect of Auxiliary Tasks on Representation Dynamicscited by 56
  2. 2024Bridging State and History Representations: Understanding Self-Predictive RLcited by 52
  3. 2022Understanding Self-Predictive Learning for Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  4. 2022Spectral Decomposition Representation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
  5. 2018Learning Awareness Modelscited by 13
  6. 2023Bootstrapped Representations in Reinforcement Learningcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

7 papers.