mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SDS++: Online Situation-Aware Drivable Space Estimation for Automated Driving

arXiv 2406.01941 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2024cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → End-to-end system architecture

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) need an accurate and up-to-date representation of the environment for safe navigation. Traditional methods, which often rely on detailed environmental representations constructed offline, struggle in dynamically changing environments or when dealing with outdated maps. Consequently, there is a pressing need for real-time solutions that can integrate diverse data sources and adapt to the current situation. An existing framework that addresses these challenges is SDS (situation-aware drivable space). However, SDS faces several limitations, including its use of a non-standard output representation, its choice of encoding objects as points, restricting representation of more complex geometries like road lanes, and the fact that its methodology has been validated only with simulated or heavily post-processed data. This work builds upon SDS and introduces SDS++, designed to overcome SDS's shortcomings while preserving its benefits. SDS++ has been rigorously validated not only in simulations but also with unrefined vehicle data, and it is integrated with a model predictive control (MPC)-based planner to verify its advantages for the planning task. The results demonstrate that SDS++ significantly enhances trajectory planning capabilities, providing increased robustness against localization noise, and enabling the planning of trajectories that adapt to the current driving context.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in End-to-end system architecture, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 10 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2024.

Builds on

10 of 46 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Prediction Horizon Requirements for Automated Driving: Optimizing Safety, Comfort, and Efficiency6 Feb

Other references · 9

  1. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  2. 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,707
  3. 2016Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization And Mapping: Towards the Robust-Perception Agecited by 405
  4. 2019A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologiescited by 373
  5. 20213D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 106
  6. 2022Rethinking Efficient Lane Detection via Curve Modelingcited by 87
  7. 2022Semantic 3D Grid Maps for Autonomous Drivingcited by 5
  8. 2022Long Horizon Risk-Averse Motion Planning: a Model-Predictive Approachcited by 1
  9. 2023Overcoming the Fear of the Dark: Occlusion-Aware Model-Predictive Planning for Automated Vehicles Using Risk Fieldscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Measuring What Matters: Scenario-Driven Evaluation for Trajectory Predictors in Autonomous Driving
  2. 2024ContextVLM: Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Context Understanding for Autonomous Driving using Vision Language Models
  3. 2024MemFusionMap: Working Memory Fusion for Online Vectorized HD Map Construction
  4. 2025MambaMap: Online Vectorized HD Map Construction using State Space Model
  5. 2026Safe and Stylized Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Driving via Diffusion Model
  6. 2026Driving on Registers, Reasoning on Risk: Risk-Aware Occupancy for Register-Based End-to-End Autonomous Driving
  7. 2023End-to-end Autonomous Driving: Challenges and Frontiers
  8. 2024Driving by the Rules: A Benchmark for Integrating Traffic Sign Regulations into Vectorized HD Map