SLANT: Spurious Logo ANalysis Toolkit
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Online content is filled with logos, from ads and social media posts to website branding and product placements. Consequently, these logos are prevalent in the extensive web-scraped datasets used to pretrain Vision-Language Models, which are used for a wide array of tasks (content moderation, object classification). While these models have been shown to learn harmful correlations in various tasks, whether these correlations include logos remains understudied. Understanding this is especially important due to logos often being used by public-facing entities like brands and government agencies. To that end, we develop SLANT: A Spurious Logo ANalysis Toolkit. Our key finding is that some logos indeed lead to spurious incorrect predictions, for example, adding the Adidas logo to a photo of a person causes a model classify the person as greedy. SLANT contains a semi-automatic mechanism for mining such "spurious" logos. The mechanism consists of a comprehensive logo bank, CC12M-LogoBank, and an algorithm that searches the bank for logos that VLMs spuriously correlate with a user-provided downstream recognition target. We uncover various seemingly harmless logos that VL models correlate 1) with negative human adjectives 2) with the concept of `harmlessness'; causing models to misclassify harmful online content as harmless, and 3) with user-provided object concepts; causing lower recognition accuracy on ImageNet zero-shot classification. Furthermore, SLANT's logos can be seen as effective attacks against foundational models; an attacker could place a spurious logo on harmful content, causing the model to misclassify it as harmless. This threat is alarming considering the simplicity of logo attacks, increasing the attack surface of VL models. As a defense, we include in our Toolkit two effective mitigation strategies that seamlessly integrate with zero-shot inference of foundation models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2024.
Builds on
17 of 23 references.
References · 17
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,388
- 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,544
- 2021Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Conceptscited by 1,209
- 2023The Dawn of LMMs: Preliminary Explorations with GPT-4V(ision)cited by 677
- 2020The Hateful Memes Challenge: Detecting Hate Speech in Multimodal Memescited by 485
- 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 426
- 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 379
- 2023Scaling Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 335
- 2021Evaluating CLIP: Towards Characterization of Broader Capabilities and Downstream Implicationscited by 128
5 more
- 2022A Whac-A-Mole Dilemma: Shortcuts Come in Multiples Where Mitigating One Amplifies Otherscited by 85
- 2022Hate-CLIPper: Multimodal Hateful Meme Classification based on Cross-modal Interaction of CLIP Featurescited by 55
- 2023Vision-Language Models Performing Zero-Shot Tasks Exhibit Gender-based Disparitiescited by 31
- 2023Mapping Memes to Words for Multimodal Hateful Meme Classificationcited by 19
- 2023Mark My Words: Dangers of Watermarked Images in ImageNetcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025From Unlearning to UNBRANDING: A Benchmark for Trademark-Safe Text-to-Image Generation
- 2023FashionLOGO: Prompting Multimodal Large Language Models for Fashion Logo Embeddings
- 2025Logo-VGR: Visual Grounded Reasoning for Open-world Logo Recognition
- 2023A Review of Vision-Language Models and their Performance on the Hateful Memes Challenge
- 2025Labels or Input? Rethinking Augmentation in Multimodal Hate Detection
- 2025Silent Branding Attack: Trigger-free Data Poisoning Attack on Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
- 2024Identifying Implicit Social Biases in Vision-Language Models
- 2024LogoSticker: Inserting Logos into Diffusion Models for Customized Generation