Mark My Words: Dangers of Watermarked Images in ImageNet
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The utilization of pre-trained networks, especially those trained on ImageNet, has become a common practice in Computer Vision. However, prior research has indicated that a significant number of images in the ImageNet dataset contain watermarks, making pre-trained networks susceptible to learning artifacts such as watermark patterns within their latent spaces. In this paper, we aim to assess the extent to which popular pre-trained architectures display such behavior and to determine which classes are most affected. Additionally, we examine the impact of watermarks on the extracted features. Contrary to the popular belief that the Chinese logographic watermarks impact the "carton" class only, our analysis reveals that a variety of ImageNet classes, such as "monitor", "broom", "apron" and "safe" rely on spurious correlations. Finally, we propose a simple approach to mitigate this issue in fine-tuned networks by ignoring the encodings from the feature-extractor layer of ImageNet pre-trained networks that are most susceptible to watermark imprints.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2023.
Builds on
20 of 29 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
- 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,360
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
8 more
- 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
- 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
- 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 374
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 359
- 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 342
- 2014One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networkscited by 264
- 2022On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious Correlationscited by 145
- 2020Large-scale Robust Deep AUC Maximization: A New Surrogate Loss and Empirical Studies on Medical Image Classificationcited by 84
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Labeling Neural Representations with Inverse Recognitioncited by 31
- 2025Web Artifact Attacks Disrupt Vision Language Modelscited by 2
- 2024SLANT: Spurious Logo ANalysis Toolkitcited by 1
- 2026When Multi-Sensor Fusion Fails to Generalize: Cattle Posture Classification Under Animal-Level and Temporal Distribution Shiftcited by 0
- 2026When Multi-Sensor Fusion Fails to Generalize: Cattle Posture Classification Under Animal-Level and Temporal Distribution Shift23 Jun 2026
- 2025Web Artifact Attacks Disrupt Vision Language Models17 Mar 2025
- 2024SLANT: Spurious Logo ANalysis Toolkit3 Jun 2024
- 2023Labeling Neural Representations with Inverse Recognition22 Nov 2023