Superhuman performance in urology board questions by an explainable large language model enabled for context integration of the European Association of Urology guidelines: the UroBot study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are revolutionizing medical Question-Answering (medQA) through extensive use of medical literature. However, their performance is often hampered by outdated training data and a lack of explainability, which limits clinical applicability. This study aimed to create and assess UroBot, a urology-specialized chatbot, by comparing it with state-of-the-art models and the performance of urologists on urological board questions, ensuring full clinician-verifiability. UroBot was developed using OpenAI's GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and GPT-4o models, employing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and the latest 2023 guidelines from the European Association of Urology (EAU). The evaluation included ten runs of 200 European Board of Urology (EBU) In-Service Assessment (ISA) questions, with performance assessed by the mean Rate of Correct Answers (RoCA). UroBot-4o achieved an average RoCA of 88.4%, surpassing GPT-4o by 10.8%, with a score of 77.6%. It was also clinician-verifiable and exhibited the highest run agreement as indicated by Fleiss' Kappa (k = 0.979). By comparison, the average performance of urologists on board questions, as reported in the literature, is 68.7%. UroBot's clinician-verifiable nature and superior accuracy compared to both existing models and urologists on board questions highlight its potential for clinical integration. The study also provides the necessary code and instructions for further development of UroBot.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2024.
Builds on
8 of 38 references.
References · 8
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
- 2023Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problemscited by 630
- 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 343
- 2023RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 272
- 2024Seven Failure Points When Engineering a Retrieval Augmented Generation Systemcited by 138
- 2024Beyond prompt brittleness: Evaluating the reliability and consistency of political worldviews in LLMscited by 55
- 2023Dermatologist-like explainable AI enhances trust and confidence in diagnosing melanomacited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 202547B Mixture-of-Experts Beats 671B Dense Models on Chinese Medical Examinations
- 2025IMB: An Italian Medical Benchmark for Question Answering
- 2024Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models vs Peer Patients for Interpreting Lab Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study
- 2024MedExpQA: Multilingual Benchmarking of Large Language Models for Medical Question Answering
- 2025Evaluating Large Language Models for Evidence-Based Clinical Question Answering
- 2025Performance of GPT-5 Frontier Models in Ophthalmology Question Answering
- 2024Answering real-world clinical questions using large language model based systems
- 2024Pattern Recognition or Medical Knowledge? The Problem with Multiple-Choice Questions in Medicine