mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Strengthened Symbol Binding Makes Large Language Models Reliable Multiple-Choice Selectors

arXiv 2406.01026 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) constitute a critical area of research in the study of Large Language Models (LLMs). Previous works have investigated the selection bias problem in MCQs within few-shot scenarios, in which the LLM's performance may be influenced by the presentation of answer choices, leaving the selection bias during Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) unexplored. In this paper, we reveal that selection bias persists in the SFT phase , primarily due to the LLM's inadequate Multiple Choice Symbol Binding (MCSB) ability. This limitation implies that the model struggles to associate the answer options with their corresponding symbols (e.g., A/B/C/D) effectively. To enhance the model's MCSB capability, we first incorporate option contents into the loss function and subsequently adjust the weights of the option symbols and contents, guiding the model to understand the option content of the current symbol. Based on this, we introduce an efficient SFT algorithm for MCQs, termed Point-wise Intelligent Feedback (PIF). PIF constructs negative instances by randomly combining the incorrect option contents with all candidate symbols, and proposes a point-wise loss to provide feedback on these negative samples into LLMs. Our experimental results demonstrate that PIF significantly reduces the model's selection bias by improving its MCSB capability. Remarkably, PIF exhibits a substantial enhancement in the accuracy for MCQs.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2024.

Builds on

25 of 31 references.

References · 25

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  7. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  8. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  9. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  10. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
  11. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  12. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
13 more
  1. 2016ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledgecited by 1,065
  2. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
  3. 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 694
  4. 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 615
  5. 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 454
  6. 2021PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-trainingcited by 298
  7. 2023Large Language Models Sensitivity to The Order of Options in Multiple-Choice Questionscited by 249
  8. 2023Pretraining Language Models with Human Preferencescited by 245
  9. 2023Label Words are Anchors: An Information Flow Perspective for Understanding In-Context Learningcited by 235
  10. 2022Leveraging Large Language Models for Multiple Choice Question Answeringcited by 199
  11. 2017Interactive Learning from Policy-Dependent Human Feedbackcited by 155
  12. 2023Chain of Hindsight Aligns Language Models with Feedbackcited by 147
  13. 2023Reinforcement Learning from Diverse Human Preferencescited by 24

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: