Optimal bounds for ℓp sensitivity sampling via ℓ2 augmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data subsampling is one of the most natural methods to approximate a massively large data set by a small representative proxy. In particular, sensitivity sampling received a lot of attention, which samples points proportional to an individual importance measure called sensitivity. This framework reduces in very general settings the size of data to roughly the VC dimension d times the total sensitivity mathfrak S while providing strong (1±varepsilon) guarantees on the quality of approximation. The recent work of Woodruff & Yasuda (2023c) improved substantially over the general tilde O(varepsilon-2mathfrak Sd) bound for the important problem of ℓp subspace embeddings to tilde O(varepsilon-2mathfrak S2/p) for p∈[1,2]. Their result was subsumed by an earlier tilde O(varepsilon-2mathfrak Sd1-p/2) bound which was implicitly given in the work of Chen & Derezinski (2021). We show that their result is tight when sampling according to plain ℓp sensitivities. We observe that by augmenting the ℓp sensitivities by ℓ2 sensitivities, we obtain better bounds improving over the aforementioned results to optimal linear tilde O(varepsilon-2(mathfrak S+d)) = tilde O(varepsilon-2d) sampling complexity for all p ∈ [1,2]. In particular, this resolves an open question of Woodruff & Yasuda (2023c) in the affirmative for p ∈ [1,2] and brings sensitivity subsampling into the regime that was previously only known to be possible using Lewis weights (Cohen & Peng, 2015). As an application of our main result, we also obtain an tilde O(varepsilon-2μ d) sensitivity sampling bound for logistic regression, where μ is a natural complexity measure for this problem. This improves over the previous tilde O(varepsilon-2μ2 d) bound of Mai et al. (2021) which was based on Lewis weights subsampling.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2024.
Builds on
21 of 43 references.
References · 21
- 2018Turning Big data into tiny data: Constant-size coresets for k-means, PCA and projective clusteringcited by 94
- 2018On Coresets for Logistic Regressioncited by 67
- 2020Coresets for Near-Convex Functionscited by 38
- 2021A New Coreset Framework for Clusteringcited by 38
- 2021Coresets for Classification -- Simplified and Strengthenedcited by 28
- 2021Query Complexity of Least Absolute Deviation Regression via Robust Uniform Convergencecited by 24
- 2021Oblivious sketching for logistic regressioncited by 18
- 2022Online Lewis Weight Samplingcited by 15
- 2018Generic Coreset for Scalable Learning of Monotonic Kernels: Logistic Regression, Sigmoid and morecited by 14
- 2015Input Sparsity and Hardness for Robust Subspace Approximationcited by 12
- 2022p-Generalized Probit Regression and Scalable Maximum Likelihood Estimation via Sketching and Coresetscited by 11
- 2023New Subset Selection Algorithms for Low Rank Approximation: Offline and Onlinecited by 11
9 more
- 2020Non-Adaptive Adaptive Sampling on Turnstile Streamscited by 9
- 2014ℓp Row Sampling by Lewis Weightscited by 8
- 2023Almost Linear Constant-Factor Sketching for ℓ1 and Logistic Regressioncited by 8
- 2022An Empirical Evaluation of k-Means Coresetscited by 7
- 2019Tight Bounds for the Subspace Sketch Problem with Applicationscited by 6
- 2024Scalable Learning of Item Response Theory Modelscited by 6
- 2024Sensitivity Sampling for k-Means: Worst Case and Stability Optimal Coreset Boundscited by 5
- 2023Sparsifying sums of normscited by 4
- 2023Tight Bounds for Volumetric Spanners and Applicationscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2026Scalable Learning of Multivariate Distributions via Coresets20 Mar 2026
- 2024The Space Complexity of Approximating Logistic Loss3 Dec 2024
- 2024Data subsampling for Poisson regression with pth-root-link30 Oct 2024