mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Space Complexity of Approximating Logistic Loss

arXiv 2412.02639 ↗First posted 3 Dec 2024cs.DS cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We provide space complexity lower bounds for data structures that approximate logistic loss up to ε-relative error on a logistic regression problem with data X ∈ ℝn × d and labels y ∈ -1,1d. The space complexity of existing coreset constructions depend on a natural complexity measure μy(X), first defined in (Munteanu, 2018). We give an tildeOmega(fracdε2) space complexity lower bound in the regime μy(X) = O(1) that shows existing coresets are optimal in this regime up to lower order factors. We also prove a general tildeOmega(d· μy(X)) space lower bound when ε is constant, showing that the dependency on μy(X) is not an artifact of mergeable coresets. Finally, we refute a prior conjecture that μy(X) is hard to compute by providing an efficient linear programming formulation, and we empirically compare our algorithm to prior approximate methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2024.

Builds on

8 of 17 references.

References · 8

  1. 2014Sketching as a Tool for Numerical Linear Algebracited by 285
  2. 2018On Coresets for Logistic Regressioncited by 65
  3. 2021Coresets for Classification -- Simplified and Strengthenedcited by 28
  4. 2021Oblivious sketching for logistic regressioncited by 18
  5. 2022Online Lewis Weight Samplingcited by 15
  6. 2013Lower bounds for oblivious subspace embeddingscited by 11
  7. 2019Tight Bounds for the Subspace Sketch Problem with Applicationscited by 6
  8. 2024Optimal bounds for ℓp sensitivity sampling via ℓ2 augmentationcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.