Input Sparsity and Hardness for Robust Subspace Approximation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the subspace approximation problem, we seek a k-dimensional subspace F of Rd that minimizes the sum of p-th powers of Euclidean distances to a given set of n points a1, ..., an in Rd, for p >= 1. More generally than minimizing sumi dist(ai,F)p,we may wish to minimize sumi M(dist(ai,F)) for some loss function M(), for example, M-Estimators, which include the Huber and Tukey loss functions. Such subspaces provide alternatives to the singular value decomposition (SVD), which is the p=2 case, finding such an F that minimizes the sum of squares of distances. For p in [1,2), and for typical M-Estimators, the minimizing F gives a solution that is more robust to outliers than that provided by the SVD. We give several algorithmic and hardness results for these robust subspace approximation problems. We think of the n points as forming an n x d matrix A, and letting nnz(A) denote the number of non-zero entries of A. Our results hold for p in [1,2). We use poly(n) to denote nO(1) as n -> infty. We obtain: (1) For minimizing sumi dist(ai,F)p, we give an algorithm running in O(nnz(A) + (n+d)poly(k/eps) + exp(poly(k/eps))), (2) we show that the problem of minimizing sumi dist(ai, F)p is NP-hard, even to output a (1+1/poly(d))-approximation, answering a question of Kannan and Vempala, and complementing prior results which held for p >2, (3) For loss functions for a wide class of M-Estimators, we give a problem-size reduction: for a parameter K=(log n)O(log k), our reduction takes O(nnz(A) log n + (n+d) poly(K/eps)) time to reduce the problem to a constrained version involving matrices whose dimensions are poly(K eps-1 log n). We also give bicriteria solutions, (4) Our techniques lead to the first O(nnz(A) + poly(d/eps)) time algorithms for (1+eps)-approximate regression for a wide class of convex M-Estimators.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 2.
12 papers.
- 2021Compressing Neural Networks: Towards Determining the Optimal Layer-wise Decompositioncited by 33
- 2022New Coresets for Projective Clustering and Applicationscited by 16
- 2023Almost Linear Constant-Factor Sketching for ℓ1 and Logistic Regressioncited by 8
- 2024Scalable Learning of Item Response Theory Modelscited by 6
- 2021Near-Optimal Algorithms for Linear Algebra in the Current Matrix Multiplication Timecited by 4
- 2023On Generalization Bounds for Projective Clusteringcited by 4
- 2024Optimal bounds for ℓp sensitivity sampling via ℓ2 augmentationcited by 3
- 2024Ridge Leverage Score Sampling for ℓp Subspace Approximationcited by 2
- 2023Sharper Bounds for ℓp Sensitivity Samplingcited by 0
- 2024Coresets for Multiple ℓp Regressioncited by 0
- 2025Guessing Efficiently for Constrained Subspace Approximationcited by 0
- 2025k-PCA for (non-squared) Euclidean Distances: Polynomial Time Approximationcited by 0
- 2025k-PCA for (non-squared) Euclidean Distances: Polynomial Time Approximation19 Jul 2025
- 2025Guessing Efficiently for Constrained Subspace Approximation29 Apr 2025
- 2024Ridge Leverage Score Sampling for ℓp Subspace Approximation3 Jul 2024
- 2024Coresets for Multiple ℓp Regression4 Jun 2024
- 2024Optimal bounds for ℓp sensitivity sampling via ℓ2 augmentation1 Jun 2024
- 2024Scalable Learning of Item Response Theory Models1 Mar 2024
- 2023On Generalization Bounds for Projective Clustering13 Oct 2023
- 2023Sharper Bounds for ℓp Sensitivity Sampling1 Jun 2023
- 2023Almost Linear Constant-Factor Sketching for ℓ1 and Logistic Regression31 Mar 2023
- 2022New Coresets for Projective Clustering and Applications8 Mar 2022
- 2021Compressing Neural Networks: Towards Determining the Optimal Layer-wise Decomposition23 Jul 2021
- 2021Near-Optimal Algorithms for Linear Algebra in the Current Matrix Multiplication Time16 Jul 2021