mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

HOLMES: to Detect Adversarial Examples with Multiple Detectors

arXiv 2405.19956 ↗First posted 30 May 2024cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks (DNNs) can easily be cheated by some imperceptible but purposeful noise added to images, and erroneously classify them. Previous defensive work mostly focused on retraining the models or detecting the noise, but has either shown limited success rates or been attacked by new adversarial examples. Instead of focusing on adversarial images or the interior of DNN models, we observed that adversarial examples generated by different algorithms can be identified based on the output of DNNs (logits). Logit can serve as an exterior feature to train detectors. Then, we propose HOLMES (Hierarchically Organized Light-weight Multiple dEtector System) to reinforce DNNs by detecting potential adversarial examples to minimize the threats they may bring in practical. HOLMES is able to distinguish textitunseen adversarial examples from multiple attacks with high accuracy and low false positive rates than single detector systems even in an adaptive model. To ensure the diversity and randomness of detectors in HOLMES, we use two methods: training dedicated detectors for each label and training detectors with top-k logits. Our effective and inexpensive strategies neither modify original DNN models nor require its internal parameters. HOLMES is not only compatible with all kinds of learning models (even only with external APIs), but also complementary to other defenses to achieve higher detection rates (may also fully protect the system against various adversarial examples).

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2024.

Builds on

25 of 48 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  6. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  7. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  8. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
  9. 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,009
  10. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 903
  11. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 678
  12. 2013Speech Recognition with Deep Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 669
13 more
  1. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 546
  2. 2016Delving into Transferable Adversarial Examples and Black-box Attackscited by 536
  3. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 486
  4. 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 282
  5. 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 269
  6. 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 245
  7. 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
  8. 2017On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examplescited by 180
  9. 2014Towards Deep Neural Network Architectures Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 146
  10. 2016Adversarial Examples Detection in Deep Networks with Convolutional Filter Statisticscited by 77
  11. 2017Mitigating Evasion Attacks to Deep Neural Networks via Region-based Classificationcited by 56
  12. 2017Adversarial and Clean Data Are Not Twinscited by 52
  13. 2016Globally Normalized Transition-Based Neural Networkscited by 26

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.