mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Faithful Chart Summarization with ChaTS-Pi

arXiv 2405.19094 ↗First posted 29 May 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Chart-to-summary generation can help explore data, communicate insights, and help the visually impaired people. Multi-modal generative models have been used to produce fluent summaries, but they can suffer from factual and perceptual errors. In this work we present CHATS-CRITIC, a reference-free chart summarization metric for scoring faithfulness. CHATS-CRITIC is composed of an image-to-text model to recover the table from a chart, and a tabular entailment model applied to score the summary sentence by sentence. We find that CHATS-CRITIC evaluates the summary quality according to human ratings better than reference-based metrics, either learned or n-gram based, and can be further used to fix candidate summaries by removing not supported sentences. We then introduce CHATS-PI, a chart-to-summary pipeline that leverages CHATS-CRITIC during inference to fix and rank sampled candidates from any chart-summarization model. We evaluate CHATS-PI and CHATS-CRITIC using human raters, establishing state-of-the-art results on two popular chart-to-summary datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2024.

Builds on

28 of 43 references.

References · 28

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  2. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,479
  3. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  4. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 824
  5. 2022PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Modelcited by 766
  6. 2019TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verificationcited by 428
  7. 2021QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluationcited by 244
  8. 2021QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarizationcited by 236
  9. 2021TAPEX: Table Pre-training via Learning a Neural SQL Executorcited by 235
  10. 2022Chart-to-Text: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Chart Summarizationcited by 169
  11. 2022DePlot: One-shot visual language reasoning by plot-to-table translationcited by 160
  12. 2022MatCha: Enhancing Visual Language Pretraining with Math Reasoning and Chart Derenderingcited by 133
16 more
  1. 2019Handling Divergent Reference Texts when Evaluating Table-to-Text Generationcited by 119
  2. 2023LongEval: Guidelines for Human Evaluation of Faithfulness in Long-form Summarizationcited by 96
  3. 2021Learning Compact Metrics for MTcited by 93
  4. 2019Answers Unite! Unsupervised Metrics for Reinforced Summarization Modelscited by 92
  5. 2020Chart-to-Text: Generating Natural Language Descriptions for Charts by Adapting the Transformer Modelcited by 78
  6. 2021SciCap: Generating Captions for Scientific Figurescited by 77
  7. 2020Understanding tables with intermediate pre-trainingcited by 68
  8. 2020What Have We Achieved on Text Summarization?cited by 65
  9. 2023Benchmarking Large Language Model Capabilities for Conditional Generationcited by 29
  10. 2020Towards a Decomposable Metric for Explainable Evaluation of Text Generation from AMRcited by 25
  11. 2022Table-To-Text generation and pre-training with TabT5cited by 20
  12. 2023SCITUNE: Aligning Large Language Models with Human-Curated Scientific Multimodal Instructionscited by 19
  13. 2021AutoChart: A Dataset for Chart-to-Text Generation Taskcited by 13
  14. 2023With a Little Push, NLI Models can Robustly and Efficiently Predict Faithfulnesscited by 13
  15. 2022TaTa: A Multilingual Table-to-Text Dataset for African Languagescited by 10
  16. 2023Semantic Feature Verification in FLAN-T5cited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

5 papers.