GLANCE: Global Actions in a Nutshell for Counterfactual Explainability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The widespread deployment of machine learning systems in critical real-world decision-making applications has highlighted the urgent need for counterfactual explainability methods that operate effectively. Global counterfactual explanations, expressed as actions to offer recourse, aim to provide succinct explanations and insights applicable to large population subgroups. High effectiveness, measured by the fraction of the population that is provided recourse, ensures that the actions benefit as many individuals as possible. Keeping the cost of actions low ensures the proposed recourse actions remain practical and actionable. Limiting the number of actions that provide global counterfactuals is essential to maximizing interpretability. The primary challenge, therefore, is to balance these trade-offs--maximizing effectiveness, minimizing cost, while maintaining a small number of actions. We introduce textttGLANCE, a versatile and adaptive algorithm that employs a novel agglomerative approach, jointly considering both the feature space and the space of counterfactual actions, thereby accounting for the distribution of points in a way that aligns with the model's structure. This design enables the careful balancing of the trade-offs among the three key objectives, with the size objective functioning as a tunable parameter to keep the actions few and easy to interpret. Our extensive experimental evaluation demonstrates that textttGLANCE consistently shows greater robustness and performance compared to existing methods across various datasets and models.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2024.
Builds on
21 of 35 references.
References · 21
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
- 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 328
- 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
- 2021Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Modelscited by 136
- 2020A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospectscited by 118
- 2020Explainable k-Means and k-Medians Clusteringcited by 67
- 2019CERTIFAI: Counterfactual Explanations for Robustness, Transparency, Interpretability, and Fairness of Artificial Intelligence modelscited by 34
- 2020ExKMC: Expanding Explainable k-Means Clusteringcited by 31
- 2022Global Counterfactual Explainer for Graph Neural Networkscited by 30
- 2023GLOBE-CE: A Translation-Based Approach for Global Counterfactual Explanationscited by 27
9 more
- 2021On the price of explainability for some clustering problemscited by 21
- 2021Explainable k-means. Don't be greedy, plant bigger trees!cited by 15
- 2021Counterfactual Explanations for Oblique Decision Trees: Exact, Efficient Algorithmscited by 14
- 2022Global Counterfactual Explanations: Investigations, Implementations and Improvementscited by 9
- 2023Explaining Groups of Instances Counterfactually for XAI: A Use Case, Algorithm and User Study for Group-Counterfactualscited by 9
- 2023Fairness Aware Counterfactuals for Subgroupscited by 9
- 2023Generating collective counterfactual explanations in score-based classification via mathematical optimizationcited by 9
- 2018HELOC Applicant Risk Performance Evaluation by Topological Hierarchical Decompositioncited by 5
- 2020Inverse Classification with Limited Budget and Maximum Number of Perturbed Samplescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
6 papers.
- 2025Explaining Concept Drift through the Evolution of Group Counterfactualscited by 2
- 2026Revealing Positive and Negative Role Models to Help People Make Good Decisionscited by 1
- 2026The Impact of Machine Learning Uncertainty on the Robustness of Counterfactual Explanationscited by 0
- 2026GALACTIC: Global and Local Agnostic Counterfactuals for Time-series Clusteringcited by 0
- 2026CEL: Comprehensive Counterfactual Explanations Library and Benchmarkcited by 0
- 2026Challenges in Evaluating Explanation Methods for Static and Evolving Datacited by 0
- 2026Challenges in Evaluating Explanation Methods for Static and Evolving Data6 Aug 2026
- 2026CEL: Comprehensive Counterfactual Explanations Library and Benchmark24 Jul 2026
- 2026GALACTIC: Global and Local Agnostic Counterfactuals for Time-series Clustering5 Mar 2026
- 2026Revealing Positive and Negative Role Models to Help People Make Good Decisions3 Mar 2026
- 2026The Impact of Machine Learning Uncertainty on the Robustness of Counterfactual Explanations20 Jan 2026
- 2025Explaining Concept Drift through the Evolution of Group Counterfactuals11 Sep 2025