mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Data-driven Machinery Fault Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review

arXiv 2405.18843 ↗First posted 29 May 2024cs.AI cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this era of advanced manufacturing, it's now more crucial than ever to diagnose machine faults as early as possible to guarantee their safe and efficient operation. With the massive surge in industrial big data and advancement in sensing and computational technologies, data-driven Machinery Fault Diagnosis (MFD) solutions based on machine/deep learning approaches have been used ubiquitously in manufacturing. Timely and accurately identifying faulty machine signals is vital in industrial applications for which many relevant solutions have been proposed and are reviewed in many articles. Despite the availability of numerous solutions and reviews on MFD, existing works often lack several aspects. Most of the available literature has limited applicability in a wide range of manufacturing settings due to their concentration on a particular type of equipment or method of analysis. Additionally, discussions regarding the challenges associated with implementing data-driven approaches, such as dealing with noisy data, selecting appropriate features, and adapting models to accommodate new or unforeseen faults, are often superficial or completely overlooked. Thus, this survey provides a comprehensive review of the articles using different types of machine learning approaches for the detection and diagnosis of various types of machinery faults, highlights their strengths and limitations, provides a review of the methods used for condition-based analyses, comprehensively discusses the available machinery fault datasets, introduces future researchers to the possible challenges they have to encounter while using these approaches for MFD and recommends the probable solutions to mitigate those problems. The future research prospects are also pointed out for a better understanding of the field. We believe this article will help researchers and contribute to the further development of the field.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 404 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2024.

Builds on

12 of 404 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
  3. 2017Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Networks to Guide Marker Discoverycited by 566
  4. 2020Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Reviewcited by 159
  5. 2020Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs Survey): Challenges, Solutions, and Future Directionscited by 65
  6. 2021Offline Meta-Reinforcement Learning for Industrial Insertioncited by 37
  7. 2019A Novel GAN-based Fault Diagnosis Approach for Imbalanced Industrial Time Seriescited by 24
  8. 2017Pre-Processing-Free Gear Fault Diagnosis Using Small Datasets with Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Transfer Learningcited by 17
  9. 2020Deep Learning Algorithms for Rotating Machinery Intelligent Diagnosis: An Open Source Benchmark Studycited by 17
  10. 2019Wasserstein Distance based Deep Adversarial Transfer Learning for Intelligent Fault Diagnosiscited by 13
  11. 2020A comprehensive review on convolutional neural network in machine fault diagnosiscited by 8
  12. 2019Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms for Bearing Fault Diagnostics -- A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

7 papers.