mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

No Dtrain: Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations Using Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2405.18563 ↗First posted 28 May 2024cs.LG stat.MEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) methods have experienced significant growth in the past decade, yet their practical application in high-impact real-world domains has been hindered by their opacity. When ML methods are responsible for making critical decisions, stakeholders often require insights into how to alter these decisions. Counterfactual explanations (CFEs) have emerged as a solution, offering interpretations of opaque ML models and providing a pathway to transition from one decision to another. However, most existing CFE methods require access to the model's training dataset, few methods can handle multivariate time-series, and none of model-agnostic CFE methods can handle multivariate time-series without training datasets. These limitations can be formidable in many scenarios. In this paper, we present NTD-CFE, a novel model-agnostic CFE method based on reinforcement learning (RL) that generates CFEs when training datasets are unavailable. NTD-CFE is suitable for both static and multivariate time-series datasets with continuous and discrete features. NTD-CFE reduces the CFE search space from a multivariate time-series domain to a lower dimensional space and addresses the problem using RL. Users have the flexibility to specify non-actionable, immutable, and preferred features, as well as causal constraints. We demonstrate the performance of NTD-CFE against four baselines on several datasets and find that, despite not having access to a training dataset, NTD-CFE finds CFEs that make significantly fewer and significantly smaller changes to the input time-series. These properties make CFEs more actionable, as the magnitude of change required to alter an outcome is vastly reduced. The code is available in the supplementary material.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2024.

Builds on

21 of 41 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  4. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  5. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  6. 2018World Modelscited by 1,444
  7. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  8. 2017Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 723
  9. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
  10. 2020A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospectscited by 118
  11. 2020Instance-based Counterfactual Explanations for Time Series Classificationcited by 64
  12. 2020Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning on Multivariate Time Series Datacited by 49
9 more
  1. 2021Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approaches: A Surveycited by 40
  2. 2021Counterfactual Explanations in Sequential Decision Making Under Uncertaintycited by 36
  3. 2021Amortized Generation of Sequential Algorithmic Recourses for Black-box Modelscited by 24
  4. 2021Counterfactual Explanations for Arbitrary Regression Modelscited by 22
  5. 2021Model-agnostic and Scalable Counterfactual Explanations via Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
  6. 2021DiCE4EL: Interpreting Process Predictions using a Milestone-Aware Counterfactual Approachcited by 13
  7. 2020Cracking the Black Box: Distilling Deep Sports Analyticscited by 12
  8. 2022Diverse Counterfactual Explanations for Anomaly Detection in Time Seriescited by 10
  9. 2023Cause-Effect Inference in Location-Scale Noise Models: Maximum Likelihood vs. Independence Testingcited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.