Probing Neural Topology of Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Probing large language models (LLMs) has yielded valuable insights into their internal mechanisms by linking neural activations to interpretable semantics. However, the complex mechanisms that link neuron's functional co-activation with the emergent model capabilities remains largely unknown, hindering a deeper understanding and safer development of LLMs. In this work, we introduce graph probing, a method for uncovering the functional connectivity of LLM neurons and relating it to language generation performance. By probing models across diverse LLM families and scales, we discover a universal predictability of language generation and understanding performance using only neural topology, which persists even when retaining just 1% of neuron connections. Strikingly, probing on topology outperforms probing on activation by up to 130.4% and 67.7% on perplexity and space/time semantic regression respectively, suggesting that neural topology contains orders of richer information of LLM performance than neural activation, which can be easily extracted with simple linear or MLP probes. To explain the dependence between neural topology and language performance, we identify default networks and hub neurons in LLMs and provide causal evidence by interventional experiments on multiple benchmarks, showing that LLMs actually exploit these topological information. Further analyses suggest that graph probing can be effectively leveraged to improve the efficiency and reliability of LLMs through proof-of-concept applications in model pruning and hallucination detection. Codes and data for the graph probing toolbox are available at https://github.com/DavyMorgan/llm-graph-probing.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2025.
Builds on
59 of 88 references.
References · 59
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
38 more
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
- 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
- 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 916
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
- 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 819
- 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 815
- 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 800
- 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 767
- 2023LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 650
- 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
- 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
- 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
- 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 334
- 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 316
- 2024LLMs Know More Than They Show: On the Intrinsic Representation of LLM Hallucinationscited by 244
- 2020Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Lengthcited by 232
- 2020Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structurecited by 207
- 2019Graph Matching Networks for Learning the Similarity of Graph Structured Objectscited by 205
- 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 200
- 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoderscited by 179
- 2025Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 179
- 2021All Bark and No Bite: Rogue Dimensions in Transformer Language Models Obscure Representational Qualitycited by 156
- 2024Compact Language Models via Pruning and Knowledge Distillationcited by 148
- 2019Interpreting and improving natural-language processing (in machines) with natural language-processing (in the brain)cited by 128
- 2024HaloScope: Harnessing Unlabeled LLM Generations for Hallucination Detectioncited by 99
- 2024Unsupervised Real-Time Hallucination Detection based on the Internal States of Large Language Modelscited by 86
- 2024Instructional Fingerprinting of Large Language Modelscited by 68
- 2024How Large Language Models Encode Context Knowledge? A Layer-Wise Probing Studycited by 64
- 2024BESA: Pruning Large Language Models with Blockwise Parameter-Efficient Sparsity Allocationcited by 45
- 2024Interpreting Attention Layer Outputs with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 43
- 2024Efficient Dictionary Learning with Switch Sparse Autoencoderscited by 39
- 2024Hey, That's My Model! Introducing Chain & Hash, An LLM Fingerprinting Techniquecited by 37
- 2024Contextual Feature Extraction Hierarchies Converge in Large Language Models and the Braincited by 32
- 2023Probing Explicit and Implicit Gender Bias through LLM Conditional Text Generationcited by 31
50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tuning Enhances Activation Intensity and Diversity in the Internal Circuitry of LLMscited by 9
- 2025LocalGPT: Benchmarking and Advancing Large Language Models for Local Life Services in Meituancited by 3
- 2026Structural Graph Probing of Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Why Do Large Language Models Generate Harmful Content?cited by 0
- 2026Why Do Large Language Models Generate Harmful Content?13 Apr 2026
- 2026Structural Graph Probing of Vision-Language Models28 Mar 2026
- 2025Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tuning Enhances Activation Intensity and Diversity in the Internal Circuitry of LLMs25 Sep 2025
- 2025LocalGPT: Benchmarking and Advancing Large Language Models for Local Life Services in Meituan3 Jun 2025