mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multilingual Diversity Improves Vision-Language Representations

arXiv 2405.16915 ↗First posted 27 May 2024cs.CV cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Massive web-crawled image-text datasets lay the foundation for recent progress in multimodal learning. These datasets are designed with the goal of training a model to do well on standard computer vision benchmarks, many of which, however, have been shown to be English-centric (e.g., ImageNet). Consequently, existing data curation techniques gravitate towards using predominantly English image-text pairs and discard many potentially useful non-English samples. Our work questions this practice. Multilingual data is inherently enriching not only because it provides a gateway to learn about culturally salient concepts, but also because it depicts common concepts differently from monolingual data. We thus conduct a systematic study to explore the performance benefits of using more samples of non-English origins with respect to English vision tasks. By translating all multilingual image-text pairs from a raw web crawl to English and re-filtering them, we increase the prevalence of (translated) multilingual data in the resulting training set. Pre-training on this dataset outperforms using English-only or English-dominated datasets on ImageNet, ImageNet distribution shifts, image-English-text retrieval and on average across 38 tasks from the DataComp benchmark. On a geographically diverse task like GeoDE, we also observe improvements across all regions, with the biggest gain coming from Africa. In addition, we quantitatively show that English and non-English data are significantly different in both image and (translated) text space. We hope that our findings motivate future work to be more intentional about including multicultural and multilingual data, not just when non-English or geographically diverse tasks are involved, but to enhance model capabilities at large. All translated captions and metadata (language, CLIP score, etc.) are available on HuggingFace.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2024.

Builds on

39 of 52 references.

References · 39

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  3. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  4. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  5. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  6. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
  7. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,462
  8. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  9. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
  10. 2021Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Conceptscited by 1,216
  11. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
  12. 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 644
27 more
  1. 2020Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillationcited by 593
  2. 2020Beyond English-Centric Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 561
  3. 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 470
  4. 2016Multi30K: Multilingual English-German Image Descriptionscited by 250
  5. 2023Data Filtering Networkscited by 250
  6. 2021Combined Scaling for Zero-shot Transfer Learningcited by 182
  7. 2017No Classification without Representation: Assessing Geodiversity Issues in Open Data Sets for the Developing Worldcited by 153
  8. 2019Does Object Recognition Work for Everyone?cited by 151
  9. 2022Wukong: A 100 Million Large-scale Chinese Cross-modal Pre-training Benchmarkcited by 114
  10. 2022Chinese CLIP: Contrastive Vision-Language Pretraining in Chinesecited by 109
  11. 2022Quality Not Quantity: On the Interaction between Dataset Design and Robustness of CLIPcited by 97
  12. 2023NLPositionality: Characterizing Design Biases of Datasets and Modelscited by 94
  13. 2023Improving Multimodal Datasets with Image Captioningcited by 93
  14. 2022AltCLIP: Altering the Language Encoder in CLIP for Extended Language Capabilitiescited by 85
  15. 2018COCO-CN for Cross-Lingual Image Tagging, Captioning and Retrievalcited by 80
  16. 2021xGQA: Cross-Lingual Visual Question Answeringcited by 72
  17. 2021Broaden the Vision: Geo-Diverse Visual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 59
  18. 2023GeoDE: a Geographically Diverse Evaluation Dataset for Object Recognitioncited by 50
  19. 2023T-MARS: Improving Visual Representations by Circumventing Text Feature Learningcited by 43
  20. 2023mBLIP: Efficient Bootstrapping of Multilingual Vision-LLMscited by 41
  21. 2017Fluency-Guided Cross-Lingual Image Captioningcited by 33
  22. 2023NLLB-CLIP -- train performant multilingual image retrieval model on a budgetcited by 24
  23. 2022WinoGAViL: Gamified Association Benchmark to Challenge Vision-and-Language Modelscited by 20
  24. 2024HYPE: Hyperbolic Entailment Filtering for Underspecified Images and Textscited by 17
  25. 2024Who's in and who's out? A case study of multimodal CLIP-filtering in DataCompcited by 15
  26. 2023Does Progress On Object Recognition Benchmarks Improve Real-World Generalization?cited by 13
  27. 2023Babel-ImageNet: Massively Multilingual Evaluation of Vision-and-Language Representationscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 10; 2026: 1.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: