mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CHARP: Conversation History AwaReness Probing for Knowledge-grounded Dialogue Systems

arXiv 2405.15110 ↗First posted 24 May 2024cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we dive deep into one of the popular knowledge-grounded dialogue benchmarks that focus on faithfulness, FaithDial. We show that a significant portion of the FaithDial data contains annotation artifacts, which may bias models towards completely ignoring the conversation history. We therefore introduce CHARP, a diagnostic test set, designed for an improved evaluation of hallucinations in conversational model. CHARP not only measures hallucination but also the compliance of the models to the conversation task. Our extensive analysis reveals that models primarily exhibit poor performance on CHARP due to their inability to effectively attend to and reason over the conversation history. Furthermore, the evaluation methods of FaithDial fail to capture these shortcomings, neglecting the conversational history. Our findings indicate that there is substantial room for contribution in both dataset creation and hallucination evaluation for knowledge-grounded dialogue, and that CHARP can serve as a tool for monitoring the progress in this particular research area. CHARP is publicly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/huawei-noah/CHARP

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2024.

Builds on

40 of 55 references.

References · 40

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  6. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  7. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  8. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  9. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  10. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  11. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  12. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
28 more
  1. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  2. 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,135
  3. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  4. 2016Training Deep Nets with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 825
  5. 2018Wizard of Wikipedia: Knowledge-Powered Conversational agentscited by 530
  6. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 420
  7. 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 395
  8. 2023How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time?cited by 265
  9. 2023The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMscited by 254
  10. 2022BlenderBot 3: a deployed conversational agent that continually learns to responsibly engagecited by 197
  11. 2019Towards Debiasing Fact Verification Modelscited by 143
  12. 2022On the Origin of Hallucinations in Conversational Models: Is it the Datasets or the Models?cited by 137
  13. 2017A Knowledge-Grounded Neural Conversation Modelcited by 136
  14. 2018Dialogue Natural Language Inferencecited by 135
  15. 2022FaithDial: A Faithful Benchmark for Information-Seeking Dialoguecited by 108
  16. 2021A Comprehensive Assessment of Dialog Evaluation Metricscited by 90
  17. 2023Topical-Chat: Towards Knowledge-Grounded Open-Domain Conversationscited by 88
  18. 2021Evaluating Attribution in Dialogue Systems: The BEGIN Benchmarkcited by 75
  19. 2020I like fish, especially dolphins: Addressing Contradictions in Dialogue Modelingcited by 68
  20. 2019Evaluating Coherence in Dialogue Systems using Entailmentcited by 53
  21. 2022GODEL: Large-Scale Pre-Training for Goal-Directed Dialogcited by 50
  22. 2019Do Neural Dialog Systems Use the Conversation History Effectively? An Empirical Studycited by 47
  23. 2023Is GPT-4 a reliable rater? Evaluating Consistency in GPT-4 Text Ratingscited by 33
  24. 2023Elastic Weight Removal for Faithful and Abstractive Dialogue Generationcited by 29
  25. 2020Exposing Shallow Heuristics of Relation Extraction Models with Challenge Datacited by 20
  26. 2021Context-aware Adversarial Training for Name Regularity Bias in Named Entity Recognitioncited by 19
  27. 2020How To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: Probe Tasks as an Alternative for Token-level Evaluation Metricscited by 3
  28. 2021NATURE: Natural Auxiliary Text Utterances for Realistic Spoken Language Evaluationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.