mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sparse-Tuning: Adapting Vision Transformers with Efficient Fine-tuning and Inference

arXiv 2405.14700 ↗First posted 23 May 2024cs.CVcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) has emerged as a popular solution for adapting pre-trained Vision Transformer (ViT) models to downstream applications by updating only a small subset of parameters. While current PEFT methods have achieved fine-tuning efficiency, they overlook the efficiency of computation and GPU memory during inference, falling short of practical requirements. To address this limitation, we propose Sparse-Tuning, an efficient and effective framework that leverages popular token sparsification (TS) techniques to reduce information redundancy in images and videos, thereby significantly improving computational and memory efficiency. However, TS often compromises performance due to inevitable information loss. To address this limitation, we further introduce Dense Adapters (DA) to compensate for the information losses incurred by token sparsification. DA integrates comprehensive token information from shallow layers into the retained tokens of deeper layers, ensuring minimal performance degradation. Through the integration of TS techniques and DA, Sparse-Tuning achieves a significant reduction in computation and memory overhead while maintaining performance. Empirical results on VTAB-1K, three image datasets, and two video datasets show that Sparse-Tuning reduces GFLOPs to 66% of the original ViT-B while achieving state-of-the-art performance compared to full fine-tuning and other PEFT baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2024.

Builds on

55 of 73 references.

References · 55

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  6. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  7. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  8. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  9. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  10. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  11. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  12. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
38 more
  1. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  2. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  3. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  4. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  5. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
  6. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  7. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
  8. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
  9. 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,215
  10. 2017The "something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sensecited by 1,092
  11. 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Fastercited by 995
  12. 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 993
  13. 2021DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsificationcited by 849
  14. 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 714
  15. 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 690
  16. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
  17. 2022Masked Autoencoders As Spatiotemporal Learnerscited by 428
  18. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 419
  19. 2021Dynamic Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 405
  20. 2022Not All Patches are What You Need: Expediting Vision Transformers via Token Reorganizationscited by 359
  21. 2022Scaling & Shifting Your Features: A New Baseline for Efficient Model Tuningcited by 292
  22. 2022ST-Adapter: Parameter-Efficient Image-to-Video Transfer Learningcited by 192
  23. 2021Not All Images are Worth 16x16 Words: Dynamic Transformers for Efficient Image Recognitioncited by 143
  24. 2022Neural Prompt Searchcited by 133
  25. 2022FacT: Factor-Tuning for Lightweight Adaptation on Vision Transformercited by 133
  26. 2022Convolutional Bypasses Are Better Vision Transformer Adapterscited by 120
  27. 2013Multi-digit Number Recognition from Street View Imagery using Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 84
  28. 2023Sensitivity-Aware Visual Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 74
  29. 2023VMT-Adapter: Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for Multi-Task Dense Scene Understandingcited by 62
  30. 2023Bridging Vision and Language Encoders: Parameter-Efficient Tuning for Referring Image Segmentationcited by 61
  31. 2023SparseViT: Revisiting Activation Sparsity for Efficient High-Resolution Vision Transformercited by 60
  32. 2023Which Tokens to Use? Investigating Token Reduction in Vision Transformerscited by 59
  33. 2023MmAP : Multi-modal Alignment Prompt for Cross-domain Multi-task Learningcited by 41
  34. 2022VoP: Text-Video Co-operative Prompt Tuning for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 36
  35. 2022AdapterBias: Parameter-efficient Token-dependent Representation Shift for Adapters in NLP Taskscited by 29
  36. 2024Time-, Memory- and Parameter-Efficient Visual Adaptationcited by 28
  37. 2023UniPT: Universal Parallel Tuning for Transfer Learning with Efficient Parameter and Memorycited by 26
  38. 2023Res-Tuning: A Flexible and Efficient Tuning Paradigm via Unbinding Tuner from Backbonecited by 26

50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 9.

12 papers.