mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Recursive PAC-Bayes: A Frequentist Approach to Sequential Prior Updates with No Information Loss

arXiv 2405.14681 ↗First posted 23 May 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

PAC-Bayesian analysis is a frequentist framework for incorporating prior knowledge into learning. It was inspired by Bayesian learning, which allows sequential data processing and naturally turns posteriors from one processing step into priors for the next. However, despite two and a half decades of research, the ability to update priors sequentially without losing confidence information along the way remained elusive for PAC-Bayes. While PAC-Bayes allows construction of data-informed priors, the final confidence intervals depend only on the number of points that were not used for the construction of the prior, whereas confidence information in the prior, which is related to the number of points used to construct the prior, is lost. This limits the possibility and benefit of sequential prior updates, because the final bounds depend only on the size of the final batch. We present a novel and, in retrospect, surprisingly simple and powerful PAC-Bayesian procedure that allows sequential prior updates with no information loss. The procedure is based on a novel decomposition of the expected loss of randomized classifiers. The decomposition rewrites the loss of the posterior as an excess loss relative to a downscaled loss of the prior plus the downscaled loss of the prior, which is bounded recursively. As a side result, we also present a generalization of the split-kl and PAC-Bayes-split-kl inequalities to discrete random variables, which we use for bounding the excess losses, and which can be of independent interest. In empirical evaluation the new procedure significantly outperforms state-of-the-art.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2024.

Builds on

15 of 28 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  2. 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 533
  3. 2020Tighter risk certificates for neural networkscited by 112
  4. 2016A Strongly Quasiconvex PAC-Bayesian Boundcited by 54
  5. 2019PAC-Bayes Un-Expected Bernstein Inequalitycited by 36
  6. 2019PAC-Bayes with Backpropcited by 36
  7. 2023A unified recipe for deriving (time-uniform) PAC-Bayes boundscited by 25
  8. 2021How Tight Can PAC-Bayes be in the Small Data Regime?cited by 24
  9. 2022PAC-Bayes Generalisation Bounds for Heavy-Tailed Losses through Supermartingalescited by 24
  10. 2023More PAC-Bayes bounds: From bounded losses, to losses with general tail behaviors, to anytime validitycited by 17
  11. 2021Chebyshev-Cantelli PAC-Bayes-Bennett Inequality for the Weighted Majority Votecited by 13
  12. 2023Tighter PAC-Bayes Bounds Through Coin-Bettingcited by 13
3 more
  1. 2022Split-kl and PAC-Bayes-split-kl Inequalities for Ternary Random Variablescited by 11
  2. 2022Tighter PAC-Bayes Generalisation Bounds by Leveraging Example Difficultycited by 9
  3. 2022A Note on the Chernoff Bound for Random Variables in the Unit Intervalcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.