Online Self-Preferring Language Models
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Aligning with human preference datasets has been critical to the success of large language models (LLMs). Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) employs a costly reward model to provide feedback for on-policy sampling responses. Recently, offline methods that directly fit responses with binary preferences in the dataset have emerged as alternatives. However, existing methods do not explicitly model preference strength information, which is crucial for distinguishing different response pairs. To overcome this limitation, we propose Online Self-Preferring (OSP) language models to learn from self-generated response pairs and self-judged preference strengths. For each prompt and corresponding self-generated responses, we introduce a ranked pairing method to construct multiple response pairs with preference strength information. We then propose the soft-preference cross-entropy loss to leverage such information. Empirically, we demonstrate that leveraging preference strength is crucial for avoiding overfitting and enhancing alignment performance. OSP achieves state-of-the-art alignment performance across various metrics in two widely used human preference datasets. OSP is parameter-efficient and more robust than the dominant online method, RLHF when limited offline data are available and generalizing to out-of-domain tasks. Moreover, OSP language models established by LLMs with proficiency in self-preferring can efficiently self-improve without external supervision.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 36 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2024.
Builds on
36 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Understanding the performance gap between online and offline alignment algorithms14 May
- 2024Aligning Large Language Models by On-Policy Self-Judgment17 Feb
- 2024Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedback7 Feb
- 2023Some things are more CRINGE than others: Iterative Preference Optimization with the Pairwise Cringe Loss27 Dec
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
- 2023Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization13 Sep
- 2023Fine-Tuning Language Models with Advantage-Induced Policy Alignment4 Jun
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 28
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,873
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
- 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 672
- 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 654
16 more
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 615
- 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
- 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedbackcited by 395
- 2021Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Modelscited by 294
- 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 288
- 2023AI Alignment: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 256
- 2022Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimizationcited by 244
- 2023Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPOcited by 226
- 2023Nash Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 220
- 2024Direct Nash Optimization: Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve with General Preferencescited by 176
- 2023DeepSpeed-Chat: Easy, Fast and Affordable RLHF Training of ChatGPT-like Models at All Scalescited by 107
- 2023Language Model Self-improvement by Reinforcement Learning Contemplationcited by 75
- 2023Pairwise Proximal Policy Optimization: Harnessing Relative Feedback for LLM Alignmentcited by 57
- 2023Uncertainty-Penalized Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Diverse Reward LoRA Ensemblescited by 55
- 2022The Challenges of Exploration for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
- 2022On the Limitations of Elo: Real-World Games, are Transitive, not Additivecited by 23
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Online Preference Alignment for Language Models via Count-based Exploration
- 2024West-of-N: Synthetic Preferences for Self-Improving Reward Models
- 2024Just Say What You Want: Only-prompting Self-rewarding Online Preference Optimization
- 2024Self-supervised Preference Optimization: Enhance Your Language Model with Preference Degree Awareness
- 2024Self-Exploring Language Models: Active Preference Elicitation for Online Alignment
- 2026From RLHF to Direct Alignment: A Theoretical Unification of Preference Learning for Large Language Models
- 2024Towards Data-Centric RLHF: Simple Metrics for Preference Dataset Comparison
- 2026Spectral Souping: A Unified Framework for Online Preference Alignment