mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Just Say What You Want: Only-prompting Self-rewarding Online Preference Optimization

arXiv 2409.17534 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2024cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

We address the challenge of online Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) with a focus on self-rewarding alignment methods. In online RLHF, obtaining feedback requires interaction with the environment, which can be costly when using additional reward models or the GPT-4 API. Current self-rewarding approaches rely heavily on the discriminator's judgment capabilities, which are effective for large-scale models but challenging to transfer to smaller ones. To address these limitations, we propose a novel, only-prompting self-rewarding online algorithm that generates preference datasets without relying on judgment capabilities. Additionally, we employ fine-grained arithmetic control over the optimality gap between positive and negative examples, generating more hard negatives in the later stages of training to help the model better capture subtle human preferences. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments on two base models, Mistral-7B and Mistral-Instruct-7B, which significantly bootstrap the performance of the reference model, achieving 34.5% in the Length-controlled Win Rates of AlpacaEval 2.0.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 31 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2024.

Builds on

31 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 13

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Toward Optimal LLM Alignments Using Two-Player Games16 Jun
  2. 2024Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer26 May
  3. 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHF13 May
  4. 2024Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment1 May
  5. 2024Direct Nash Optimization: Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve with General Preferences4 Apr
  6. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Models18 Jan
  7. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint18 Dec
  8. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  9. 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedback17 May
  10. 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tears11 Apr
  11. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Apr
  12. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences18 Sep
1 more
  1. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 18

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  5. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  6. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
  7. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 906
  8. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 556
  9. 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
  10. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translationcited by 390
  11. 2023Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimizationcited by 321
  12. 2024Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Studycited by 262
6 more
  1. 2024Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedbackcited by 257
  2. 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 194
  3. 2020Implementation Matters in Deep Policy Gradients: A Case Study on PPO and TRPOcited by 184
  4. 2024Self-Exploring Language Models: Active Preference Elicitation for Online Alignmentcited by 63
  5. 2024sDPO: Don't Use Your Data All at Oncecited by 46
  6. 2024Direct Large Language Model Alignment Through Self-Rewarding Contrastive Prompt Distillationcited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Online Self-Preferring Language Models
  2. 2026Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective
  3. 2025PILAF: Optimal Human Preference Sampling for Reward Modeling
  4. 2024Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with General Preference Model
  5. 2025Influencing Humans to Conform to Preference Models for RLHF
  6. 2025Capturing Individual Human Preferences with Reward Features
  7. 2024Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learning
  8. 2024Online Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with Self-augmented Feedback from Large Language Model