Improving Fairness and Mitigating MADness in Generative Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative models unfairly penalize data belonging to minority classes, suffer from model autophagy disorder (MADness), and learn biased estimates of the underlying distribution parameters. Our theoretical and empirical results show that training generative models with intentionally designed hypernetworks leads to models that 1) are more fair when generating datapoints belonging to minority classes 2) are more stable in a self-consumed (i.e., MAD) setting, and 3) learn parameters that are less statistically biased. To further mitigate unfairness, MADness, and bias, we introduce a regularization term that penalizes discrepancies between a generative model's estimated weights when trained on real data versus its own synthetic data. To facilitate training existing deep generative models within our framework, we offer a scalable implementation of hypernetworks that automatically generates a hypernetwork architecture for any given generative model.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2024.
Builds on
19 of 65 references.
References · 19
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
- 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,626
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
- 2017Deep Image Priorcited by 1,098
- 2016HyperNetworkscited by 1,027
- 2018Meta-Learning with Latent Embedding Optimizationcited by 476
- 2019Continual learning with hypernetworkscited by 273
- 2023Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADcited by 250
- 2020BayesFlow: Learning complex stochastic models with invertible neural networkscited by 144
- 2016Variational Autoencoder for Deep Learning of Images, Labels and Captionscited by 137
- 2023A Brief Review of Hypernetworks in Deep Learningcited by 102
7 more
- 2018Bias and Generalization in Deep Generative Models: An Empirical Studycited by 83
- 2023Large Language Models Suffer From Their Own Output: An Analysis of the Self-Consuming Training Loopcited by 79
- 2021On the Frequency Bias of Generative Modelscited by 60
- 2022HyperShot: Few-Shot Learning by Kernel HyperNetworkscited by 24
- 2021Learning to Estimate Without Biascited by 9
- 2017Bias Correction with Jackknife, Bootstrap, and Taylor Seriescited by 4
- 2013Bias in parametric estimation: reduction and useful side-effectscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Equalized Generative Treatment: Matching f-divergences for Fairness in Generative Modelscited by 1
- 2026Hypernetwork-based approach for grid-independent functional data clusteringcited by 1
- 2026A lift for input-convex neural net trainingcited by 0
- 2026SynthSentry: Detecting Synthetic Data Contamination in Language Model Training Datacited by 0
- 2026SynthSentry: Detecting Synthetic Data Contamination in Language Model Training Data11 Sep 2026
- 2026A lift for input-convex neural net training22 May 2026
- 2026Hypernetwork-based approach for grid-independent functional data clustering26 Feb 2026
- 2026Equalized Generative Treatment: Matching f-divergences for Fairness in Generative Models9 Feb 2026