Pruning Federated Models through Loss Landscape Analysis and Client Agreement Scoring
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The practical deployment of Federated Learning (FL) on resource-constrained devices is fundamentally limited by the high cost of training large models and the instability caused by heterogeneous (non-IID) client data. Conventional pruning methods often treat data heterogeneity as a problem to be mitigated. In this work, we introduce a paradigm shift: we reframe client diversity as a feature to be harnessed. We propose AutoFLIP, a framework that begins not with training, but with a one-time federated loss exploration. During this phase, clients collaboratively build a map of the collective loss landscape, using their diverse data to reveal the problem's essential structure. This shared intelligence then guides an adaptive pruning strategy that is dynamically refined by client agreement throughout training. This approach allows AutoFLIP to identify robust and efficient sub-networks from the outset. Our extensive experiments show that AutoFLIP reduces computational overhead by an average of 52% and communication costs by over 65% while simultaneously achieving state-of-the-art accuracy in challenging non-IID settings.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2024.
Builds on
21 of 42 references.
References · 21
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
- 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 802
- 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 780
- 2020The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learningcited by 625
- 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 531
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 528
- 2019Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winnerscited by 491
- 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data: A Surveycited by 345
9 more
- 2020HRank: Filter Pruning using High-Rank Feature Mapcited by 291
- 2019Model Pruning Enables Efficient Federated Learning on Edge Devicescited by 219
- 2019A Vision of 6G Wireless Systems: Applications, Trends, Technologies, and Open Research Problemscited by 157
- 2019The Roadmap to 6G -- AI Empowered Wireless Networkscited by 150
- 2019Gate Decorator: Global Filter Pruning Method for Accelerating Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 118
- 2018Universal Statistics of Fisher Information in Deep Neural Networks: Mean Field Approachcited by 89
- 2019Global Sparse Momentum SGD for Pruning Very Deep Neural Networkscited by 70
- 2021Connecting Low-Loss Subspace for Personalized Federated Learningcited by 12
- 2023Guided Transfer Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025AI-Generated Video Detection via Perceptual Straighteningcited by 34