Squeezing Lemons with Hammers: An Evaluation of AutoML and Tabular Deep Learning for Data-Scarce Classification Applications
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many industry verticals are confronted with small-sized tabular data. In this low-data regime, it is currently unclear whether the best performance can be expected from simple baselines, or more complex machine learning approaches that leverage meta-learning and ensembling. On 44 tabular classification datasets with sample sizes ≤ 500, we find that L2-regularized logistic regression performs similar to state-of-the-art automated machine learning (AutoML) frameworks (AutoPrognosis, AutoGluon) and off-the-shelf deep neural networks (TabPFN, HyperFast) on the majority of the benchmark datasets. We therefore recommend to consider logistic regression as the first choice for data-scarce applications with tabular data and provide practitioners with best practices for further method selection.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2024.
Builds on
16 of 30 references.
References · 16
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Secondcited by 674
- 2020AutoGluon-Tabular: Robust and Accurate AutoML for Structured Datacited by 383
- 2023When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?cited by 223
- 2017PMLB: A Large Benchmark Suite for Machine Learning Evaluation and Comparisoncited by 140
- 2015Should we really use post-hoc tests based on mean-ranks?cited by 116
- 2018How Complex is your classification problem? A survey on measuring classification complexitycited by 66
- 2020PMLB v1.0: An open source dataset collection for benchmarking machine learning methodscited by 58
- 2015JuMP: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Optimizationcited by 49
- 2023TabRepo: A Large Scale Repository of Tabular Model Evaluations and its AutoML Applicationscited by 33
- 2018AutoPrognosis: Automated Clinical Prognostic Modeling via Bayesian Optimization with Structured Kernel Learningcited by 22
- 2024HyperFast: Instant Classification for Tabular Datacited by 22
4 more
- 2023Scaling TabPFN: Sketching and Feature Selection for Tabular Prior-Data Fitted Networkscited by 18
- 2022AutoPrognosis 2.0: Democratizing Diagnostic and Prognostic Modeling in Healthcare with Automated Machine Learningcited by 10
- 2021To tune or not to tune, a case study of ridge logistic regression in small or sparse datasetscited by 5
- 2023Cost-Sensitive Best Subset Selection for Logistic Regression: A Mixed-Integer Conic Optimization Perspectivecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.