mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Interpretable Cross-Examination Technique (ICE-T): Using highly informative features to boost LLM performance

arXiv 2405.06703 ↗First posted 8 May 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we introduce the Interpretable Cross-Examination Technique (ICE-T), a novel approach that leverages structured multi-prompt techniques with Large Language Models (LLMs) to improve classification performance over zero-shot and few-shot methods. In domains where interpretability is crucial, such as medicine and law, standard models often fall short due to their "black-box" nature. ICE-T addresses these limitations by using a series of generated prompts that allow an LLM to approach the problem from multiple directions. The responses from the LLM are then converted into numerical feature vectors and processed by a traditional classifier. This method not only maintains high interpretability but also allows for smaller, less capable models to achieve or exceed the performance of larger, more advanced models under zero-shot conditions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of ICE-T across a diverse set of data sources, including medical records and legal documents, consistently surpassing the zero-shot baseline in terms of classification metrics such as F1 scores. Our results indicate that ICE-T can be used for improving both the performance and transparency of AI applications in complex decision-making environments.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2024.

Builds on

37 of 59 references.

References · 37

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  5. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  6. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  7. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  8. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  9. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
  10. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
  11. 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,195
  12. 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
25 more
  1. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,045
  2. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
  3. 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
  4. 2021Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Modelscited by 886
  5. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 721
  6. 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 669
  7. 2021Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learningcited by 648
  8. 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 623
  9. 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 457
  10. 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 344
  11. 2021True Few-Shot Learning with Language Modelscited by 344
  12. 2021AI Chains: Transparent and Controllable Human-AI Interaction by Chaining Large Language Model Promptscited by 268
  13. 2023GPT4Tools: Teaching Large Language Model to Use Tools via Self-instructioncited by 248
  14. 2021PPT: Pre-trained Prompt Tuning for Few-shot Learningcited by 232
  15. 2019Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in Englishcited by 209
  16. 2022Active Example Selection for In-Context Learningcited by 196
  17. 2023Text Embeddings Reveal (Almost) As Much As Textcited by 192
  18. 2022The Unreliability of Explanations in Few-shot Prompting for Textual Reasoningcited by 169
  19. 2022Self-Adaptive In-Context Learning: An Information Compression Perspective for In-Context Example Selection and Orderingcited by 161
  20. 2024Relying on the Unreliable: The Impact of Language Models' Reluctance to Express Uncertaintycited by 106
  21. 2021ClimateBert: A Pretrained Language Model for Climate-Related Textcited by 90
  22. 2018CLAUDETTE: an Automated Detector of Potentially Unfair Clauses in Online Terms of Servicecited by 73
  23. 2021True Few-Shot Learning with Prompts -- A Real-World Perspectivecited by 38
  24. 2020Multilingual Stance Detection: The Catalonia Independence Corpuscited by 16
  25. 2023Large Language Model Prompt Chaining for Long Legal Document Classificationcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.