Interpretable Cross-Examination Technique (ICE-T): Using highly informative features to boost LLM performance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we introduce the Interpretable Cross-Examination Technique (ICE-T), a novel approach that leverages structured multi-prompt techniques with Large Language Models (LLMs) to improve classification performance over zero-shot and few-shot methods. In domains where interpretability is crucial, such as medicine and law, standard models often fall short due to their "black-box" nature. ICE-T addresses these limitations by using a series of generated prompts that allow an LLM to approach the problem from multiple directions. The responses from the LLM are then converted into numerical feature vectors and processed by a traditional classifier. This method not only maintains high interpretability but also allows for smaller, less capable models to achieve or exceed the performance of larger, more advanced models under zero-shot conditions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of ICE-T across a diverse set of data sources, including medical records and legal documents, consistently surpassing the zero-shot baseline in terms of classification metrics such as F1 scores. Our results indicate that ICE-T can be used for improving both the performance and transparency of AI applications in complex decision-making environments.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2024.
Builds on
37 of 59 references.
References · 37
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
- 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,195
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
25 more
- 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,045
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
- 2021Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Modelscited by 886
- 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 721
- 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 669
- 2021Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learningcited by 648
- 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 623
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 457
- 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 344
- 2021True Few-Shot Learning with Language Modelscited by 344
- 2021AI Chains: Transparent and Controllable Human-AI Interaction by Chaining Large Language Model Promptscited by 268
- 2023GPT4Tools: Teaching Large Language Model to Use Tools via Self-instructioncited by 248
- 2021PPT: Pre-trained Prompt Tuning for Few-shot Learningcited by 232
- 2019Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in Englishcited by 209
- 2022Active Example Selection for In-Context Learningcited by 196
- 2023Text Embeddings Reveal (Almost) As Much As Textcited by 192
- 2022The Unreliability of Explanations in Few-shot Prompting for Textual Reasoningcited by 169
- 2022Self-Adaptive In-Context Learning: An Information Compression Perspective for In-Context Example Selection and Orderingcited by 161
- 2024Relying on the Unreliable: The Impact of Language Models' Reluctance to Express Uncertaintycited by 106
- 2021ClimateBert: A Pretrained Language Model for Climate-Related Textcited by 90
- 2018CLAUDETTE: an Automated Detector of Potentially Unfair Clauses in Online Terms of Servicecited by 73
- 2021True Few-Shot Learning with Prompts -- A Real-World Perspectivecited by 38
- 2020Multilingual Stance Detection: The Catalonia Independence Corpuscited by 16
- 2023Large Language Model Prompt Chaining for Long Legal Document Classificationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.