mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explaining Clustering of Ecological Momentary Assessment Data Through Temporal and Feature Attention

arXiv 2405.04854 ↗First posted 8 May 2024cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the field of psychopathology, Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) studies offer rich individual data on psychopathology-relevant variables (e.g., affect, behavior, etc) in real-time. EMA data is collected dynamically, represented as complex multivariate time series (MTS). Such information is crucial for a better understanding of mental disorders at the individual- and group-level. More specifically, clustering individuals in EMA data facilitates uncovering and studying the commonalities as well as variations of groups in the population. Nevertheless, since clustering is an unsupervised task and true EMA grouping is not commonly available, the evaluation of clustering is quite challenging. An important aspect of evaluation is clustering explainability. Thus, this paper proposes an attention-based interpretable framework to identify the important time-points and variables that play primary roles in distinguishing between clusters. A key part of this study is to examine ways to analyze, summarize, and interpret the attention weights as well as evaluate the patterns underlying the important segments of the data that differentiate across clusters. To evaluate the proposed approach, an EMA dataset of 187 individuals grouped in 3 clusters is used for analyzing the derived attention-based importance attributes. More specifically, this analysis provides the distinct characteristics at the cluster-, feature- and individual level. Such clustering explanations could be beneficial for generalizing existing concepts of mental disorders, discovering new insights, and even enhancing our knowledge at an individual level.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2024.

Builds on

14 of 26 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  4. 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
  5. 2020TimeSHAP: Explaining Recurrent Models through Sequence Perturbationscited by 73
  6. 2020Explainable k-Means and k-Medians Clusteringcited by 67
  7. 2021TS-MULE: Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations for Time Series Forecast Modelscited by 28
  8. 2020Feature Importance Estimation with Self-Attention Networkscited by 21
  9. 2021How to Find a Good Explanation for Clustering?cited by 16
  10. 2022Feature Importance for Time Series Data: Improving KernelSHAPcited by 5
  11. 2022Using Explainable Boosting Machine to Compare Idiographic and Nomothetic Approaches for Ecological Momentary Assessment Datacited by 4
  12. 2022XClusters: Explainability-first Clusteringcited by 2
2 more
  1. 2022Interpretable Time Series Clustering Using Local Explanationscited by 1
  2. 2023Model-based Clustering of Individuals' Ecological Momentary Assessment Time-series Data for Improving Forecasting Performancecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.