FairMonitor: A Dual-framework for Detecting Stereotypes and Biases in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Detecting stereotypes and biases in Large Language Models (LLMs) is crucial for enhancing fairness and reducing adverse impacts on individuals or groups when these models are applied. Traditional methods, which rely on embedding spaces or are based on probability metrics, fall short in revealing the nuanced and implicit biases present in various contexts. To address this challenge, we propose the FairMonitor framework and adopt a static-dynamic detection method for a comprehensive evaluation of stereotypes and biases in LLMs. The static component consists of a direct inquiry test, an implicit association test, and an unknown situation test, including 10,262 open-ended questions with 9 sensitive factors and 26 educational scenarios. And it is effective for evaluating both explicit and implicit biases. Moreover, we utilize the multi-agent system to construst the dynamic scenarios for detecting subtle biases in more complex and realistic setting. This component detects the biases based on the interaction behaviors of LLMs across 600 varied educational scenarios. The experimental results show that the cooperation of static and dynamic methods can detect more stereotypes and biased in LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2024.
Builds on
28 of 39 references.
References · 28
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
- 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 911
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
- 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 729
- 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 683
16 more
- 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 626
- 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 410
- 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 397
- 2023Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Modelscited by 356
- 2023S3: Social-network Simulation System with Large Language Model-Empowered Agentscited by 228
- 2023Marked Personas: Using Natural Language Prompts to Measure Stereotypes in Language Modelscited by 204
- 2021Large Pre-trained Language Models Contain Human-like Biases of What is Right and Wrong to Docited by 178
- 2020Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biasescited by 167
- 2023In-Context Impersonation Reveals Large Language Models' Strengths and Biasescited by 154
- 2021Mitigating Language-Dependent Ethnic Bias in BERTcited by 87
- 2023Attack Prompt Generation for Red Teaming and Defending Large Language Modelscited by 73
- 2023How Useful are Educational Questions Generated by Large Language Models?cited by 23
- 2023Text Style Transfer Evaluation Using Large Language Modelscited by 11
- 2023WHAT, WHEN, and HOW to Ground: Designing User Persona-Aware Conversational Agents for Engaging Dialoguecited by 10
- 2022Computer says "No": The Case Against Empathetic Conversational AIcited by 9
- 2023Empathetic AI for Empowering Resilience in Gamescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024Bias in Large Language Models: Origin, Evaluation, and Mitigationcited by 77
- 2025Nuclear Deployed: Analyzing Catastrophic Risks in Decision-making of Autonomous LLM Agentscited by 23
- 2024Towards Effective Discrimination Testing for Generative AIcited by 5
- 2025A word association network methodology for evaluating implicit biases in LLMs compared to humanscited by 2
- 2026Where are the Humans? A Scoping Review of Fairness in Multi-agent AI Systemscited by 0
- 2026Where are the Humans? A Scoping Review of Fairness in Multi-agent AI Systems16 Apr 2026
- 2025A word association network methodology for evaluating implicit biases in LLMs compared to humans28 Oct 2025
- 2025Nuclear Deployed: Analyzing Catastrophic Risks in Decision-making of Autonomous LLM Agents17 Feb 2025
- 2024Towards Effective Discrimination Testing for Generative AI30 Dec 2024
- 2024Bias in Large Language Models: Origin, Evaluation, and Mitigation16 Nov 2024