Loss Jump During Loss Switch in Solving PDEs with Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Using neural networks to solve partial differential equations (PDEs) is gaining popularity as an alternative approach in the scientific computing community. Neural networks can integrate different types of information into the loss function. These include observation data, governing equations, and variational forms, etc. These loss functions can be broadly categorized into two types: observation data loss directly constrains and measures the model output, while other loss functions indirectly model the performance of the network, which can be classified as model loss. However, this alternative approach lacks a thorough understanding of its underlying mechanisms, including theoretical foundations and rigorous characterization of various phenomena. This work focuses on investigating how different loss functions impact the training of neural networks for solving PDEs. We discover a stable loss-jump phenomenon: when switching the loss function from the data loss to the model loss, which includes different orders of derivative information, the neural network solution significantly deviates from the exact solution immediately. Further experiments reveal that this phenomenon arises from the different frequency preferences of neural networks under different loss functions. We theoretically analyze the frequency preference of neural networks under model loss. This loss-jump phenomenon provides a valuable perspective for examining the underlying mechanisms of neural networks in solving PDEs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2024.
Builds on
23 of 34 references.
References · 23
- 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,170
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
- 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 617
- 2019Frequency Principle: Fourier Analysis Sheds Light on Deep Neural Networkscited by 360
- 2020On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networkscited by 279
- 2020Spectrum Dependent Learning Curves in Kernel Regression and Wide Neural Networkscited by 200
- 2021On the Origin of Implicit Regularization in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 183
- 2018Training behavior of deep neural network in frequency domaincited by 174
- 2019Towards Understanding the Spectral Bias of Deep Learningcited by 173
11 more
- 2019The Convergence Rate of Neural Networks for Learned Functions of Different Frequenciescited by 134
- 2020Estimates on the generalization error of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for approximating a class of inverse problems for PDEscited by 101
- 2020Multi-scale Deep Neural Network (MscaleDNN) for Solving Poisson-Boltzmann Equation in Complex Domainscited by 78
- 2022Overview frequency principle/spectral bias in deep learningcited by 68
- 2020Phase diagram for two-layer ReLU neural networks at infinite-width limitcited by 65
- 2019Theory of the Frequency Principle for General Deep Neural Networkscited by 45
- 2021Towards Understanding the Condensation of Neural Networks at Initial Trainingcited by 31
- 2022Implicit regularization of dropoutcited by 24
- 2020On the exact computation of linear frequency principle dynamics and its generalizationcited by 16
- 2021Subspace Decomposition based DNN algorithm for elliptic type multi-scale PDEscited by 10
- 2022A multi-scale sampling method for accurate and robust deep neural network to predict combustion chemical kineticscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.