mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Text Quality-Based Pruning for Efficient Training of Language Models

arXiv 2405.01582 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent times training Language Models (LMs) have relied on computationally heavy training over massive datasets which makes this training process extremely laborious. In this paper we propose a novel method for numerically evaluating text quality in large unlabelled NLP datasets in a model agnostic manner to assign the text instances a "quality score". By proposing the text quality metric, the paper establishes a framework to identify and eliminate low-quality text instances, leading to improved training efficiency for LM models. Experimental results over multiple models and datasets demonstrate the efficacy of this approach, showcasing substantial gains in training effectiveness and highlighting the potential for resource-efficient LM training. For example, we observe an absolute accuracy improvement of 0.9% averaged over 14 downstream evaluation tasks for multiple LM models while using 40% lesser data and training 42% faster when training on the OpenWebText dataset and 0.8% average absolute accuracy improvement while using 20% lesser data and training 21% faster on the Wikipedia dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2024.

Builds on

19 of 27 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  2. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  3. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  4. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
  5. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
  6. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
  7. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  8. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  9. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
  10. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  11. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  12. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
7 more
  1. 2023The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Onlycited by 755
  2. 2022GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Modelcited by 711
  3. 2023Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Modelscited by 356
  4. 2021All That's 'Human' Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Textcited by 287
  5. 2021Large Pre-trained Language Models Contain Human-like Biases of What is Right and Wrong to Docited by 178
  6. 2023Filtering, Distillation, and Hard Negatives for Vision-Language Pre-Trainingcited by 91
  7. 2022Validating Large Language Models with ReLMcited by 33

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 8; 2025: 1.

9 papers.