Trust Driven On-Demand Scheme for Client Deployment in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Containerization technology plays a crucial role in Federated Learning (FL) setups, expanding the pool of potential clients and ensuring the availability of specific subsets for each learning iteration. However, doubts arise about the trustworthiness of devices deployed as clients in FL scenarios, especially when container deployment processes are involved. Addressing these challenges is important, particularly in managing potentially malicious clients capable of disrupting the learning process or compromising the entire model. In our research, we are motivated to integrate a trust element into the client selection and model deployment processes within our system architecture. This is a feature lacking in the initial client selection and deployment mechanism of the On-Demand architecture. We introduce a trust mechanism, named "Trusted-On-Demand-FL", which establishes a relationship of trust between the server and the pool of eligible clients. Utilizing Docker in our deployment strategy enables us to monitor and validate participant actions effectively, ensuring strict adherence to agreed-upon protocols while strengthening defenses against unauthorized data access or tampering. Our simulations rely on a continuous user behavior dataset, deploying an optimization model powered by a genetic algorithm to efficiently select clients for participation. By assigning trust values to individual clients and dynamically adjusting these values, combined with penalizing malicious clients through decreased trust scores, our proposed framework identifies and isolates harmful clients. This approach not only reduces disruptions to regular rounds but also minimizes instances of round dismissal, Consequently enhancing both system stability and security.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2024.
Builds on
12 of 41 references.
References · 12
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2019Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 408
- 2019FedHealth: A Federated Transfer Learning Framework for Wearable Healthcarecited by 182
- 2020Client Selection and Bandwidth Allocation in Wireless Federated Learning Networks: A Long-Term Perspectivecited by 103
- 2019Byzantine-Robust Federated Machine Learning through Adaptive Model Averagingcited by 70
- 2019Central Server Free Federated Learning over Single-sided Trust Social Networkscited by 33
- 2022Clustered Vehicular Federated Learning: Process and Optimizationcited by 15
- 2020Less is More: A privacy-respecting Android malware classifier using Federated Learningcited by 8
- 2022ON-DEMAND-FL: A Dynamic and Efficient Multi-Criteria Federated Learning Client Deployment Schemecited by 7
- 2020Revisiting Agglomerative Clusteringcited by 6
- 2022FedMint: Intelligent Bilateral Client Selection in Federated Learning with Newcomer IoT Devicescited by 4
- 2022ModularFed: Leveraging Modularity in Federated Learning Frameworkscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.