mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Revisiting Agglomerative Clustering

arXiv 2005.07995 ↗First posted 16 May 2020cs.LG cs.CV stat.MLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

An important issue in clustering concerns the avoidance of false positives while searching for clusters. This work addressed this problem considering agglomerative methods, namely single, average, median, complete, centroid and Ward's approaches applied to unimodal and bimodal datasets obeying uniform, gaussian, exponential and power-law distributions. A model of clusters was also adopted, involving a higher density nucleus surrounded by a transition, followed by outliers. This paved the way to defining an objective means for identifying the clusters from dendrograms. The adopted model also allowed the relevance of the clusters to be quantified in terms of the height of their subtrees. The obtained results include the verification that many methods detect two clusters in unimodal data. The single-linkage method was found to be more resilient to false positives. Also, several methods detected clusters not corresponding directly to the nucleus. The possibility of identifying the type of distribution was also investigated.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.