mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Benchmarking Advanced Text Anonymisation Methods: A Comparative Study on Novel and Traditional Approaches

arXiv 2404.14465 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.IRcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the realm of data privacy, the ability to effectively anonymise text is paramount. With the proliferation of deep learning and, in particular, transformer architectures, there is a burgeoning interest in leveraging these advanced models for text anonymisation tasks. This paper presents a comprehensive benchmarking study comparing the performance of transformer-based models and Large Language Models(LLM) against traditional architectures for text anonymisation. Utilising the CoNLL-2003 dataset, known for its robustness and diversity, we evaluate several models. Our results showcase the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, offering a clear perspective on the efficacy of modern versus traditional methods. Notably, while modern models exhibit advanced capabilities in capturing con textual nuances, certain traditional architectures still keep high performance. This work aims to guide researchers in selecting the most suitable model for their anonymisation needs, while also shedding light on potential paths for future advancements in the field.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2024.

Builds on

5 of 17 references.

References · 5

  1. 2015Bidirectional LSTM-CRF Models for Sequence Taggingcited by 544
  2. 2018A Survey on Deep Learning for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 281
  3. 2022The Text Anonymization Benchmark (TAB): A Dedicated Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Text Anonymizationcited by 94
  4. 2020Contextualized Embeddings in Named-Entity Recognition: An Empirical Study on Generalizationcited by 15
  5. 2023Conversational Feedback in Scripted versus Spontaneous Dialogues: A Comparative Analysiscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.