mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Conversational Feedback in Scripted versus Spontaneous Dialogues: A Comparative Analysis

arXiv 2309.15656 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2023cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Scripted dialogues such as movie and TV subtitles constitute a widespread source of training data for conversational NLP models. However, there are notable linguistic differences between these dialogues and spontaneous interactions, especially regarding the occurrence of communicative feedback such as backchannels, acknowledgments, or clarification requests. This paper presents a quantitative analysis of such feedback phenomena in both subtitles and spontaneous conversations. Based on conversational data spanning eight languages and multiple genres, we extract lexical statistics, classifications from a dialogue act tagger, expert annotations and labels derived from a fine-tuned Large Language Model (LLM). Our main empirical findings are that (1) communicative feedback is markedly less frequent in subtitles than in spontaneous dialogues and (2) subtitles contain a higher proportion of negative feedback. We also show that dialogues generated by standard LLMs lie much closer to scripted dialogues than spontaneous interactions in terms of communicative feedback.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2023.

Builds on

8 of 96 references.

References · 8

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2017Scattertext: a Browser-Based Tool for Visualizing how Corpora Differcited by 22
  5. 2023SocialDial: A Benchmark for Socially-Aware Dialogue Systemscited by 22
  6. 2021Should we Stop Training More Monolingual Models, and Simply Use Machine Translation Instead?cited by 16
  7. 2023Unraveling ChatGPT: A Critical Analysis of AI-Generated Goal-Oriented Dialogues and Annotationscited by 14
  8. 2018ISO-Standard Domain-Independent Dialogue Act Tagging for Conversational Agentscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

10 papers.