Rethinking Legal Compliance Automation: Opportunities with Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As software-intensive systems face growing pressure to comply with laws and regulations, providing automated support for compliance analysis has become paramount. Despite advances in the Requirements Engineering (RE) community on legal compliance analysis, important obstacles remain in developing accurate and generalizable compliance automation solutions. This paper highlights some observed limitations of current approaches and examines how adopting new automation strategies that leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) can help address these shortcomings and open up fresh opportunities. Specifically, we argue that the examination of (textual) legal artifacts should, first, employ a broader context than sentences, which have widely been used as the units of analysis in past research. Second, the mode of analysis with legal artifacts needs to shift from classification and information extraction to more end-to-end strategies that are not only accurate but also capable of providing explanation and justification. We present a compliance analysis approach designed to address these limitations. We further outline our evaluation plan for the approach and provide preliminary evaluation results based on data processing agreements (DPAs) that must comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Our initial findings suggest that our approach yields substantial accuracy improvements and, at the same time, provides justification for compliance decisions.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2024Leveraging Graph-RAG and Prompt Engineering to Enhance LLM-Based Automated Requirement Traceability and Compliance Checkscited by 6
- 2025Engineering the Law-Machine Learning Translation Problem: Developing Legally Aligned Modelscited by 3
- 2025Interpretation Gaps in LLM-Assisted Comprehension of Privacy Documentscited by 0
- 2025Language of Persuasion and Misrepresentation in Business Communication: A Textual Detection Approachcited by 0
- 2026From Regulation to Requirements: An Automated Requirement Derivation and Explanation Pipelinecited by 0
- 2026VeriWeave Govern: Evidence-Gated Deterministic Runtime Governance for Enterprise AI Agentscited by 0
- 2026VeriWeave Govern: Evidence-Gated Deterministic Runtime Governance for Enterprise AI Agents26 Sep 2026
- 2026From Regulation to Requirements: An Automated Requirement Derivation and Explanation Pipeline5 Jul 2026
- 2025Language of Persuasion and Misrepresentation in Business Communication: A Textual Detection Approach13 Aug 2025
- 2025Engineering the Law-Machine Learning Translation Problem: Developing Legally Aligned Models23 Apr 2025
- 2025Interpretation Gaps in LLM-Assisted Comprehension of Privacy Documents15 Mar 2025
- 2024Leveraging Graph-RAG and Prompt Engineering to Enhance LLM-Based Automated Requirement Traceability and Compliance Checks11 Dec 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025From Legal Text to Tech Specs: Generative AI's Interpretation of Consent in Privacy Law ↗
- 2026ARCCS: An Automated Regulatory Compliance Checking System
- 2025Safety Compliance: Rethinking LLM Safety Reasoning through the Lens of Compliance
- 2026CTRAG: An In-Context Retrieval-based Framework for Automated Compliance Checking using LLMs
- 2026Code-as-Auditor: Executable Compliance Reasoning via Regulation-to-Code
- 2025Judging by the Rules: Compliance-Aligned Framework for Modern Slavery Statement Monitoring
- 2026Can Legislation Be Made Machine-Readable in PROLEG?
- 2026OmniCompliance-100K: A Multi-Domain, Rule-Grounded, Real-World Safety Compliance Dataset