mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can Legislation Be Made Machine-Readable in PROLEG?

arXiv 2601.01477 ↗First posted 4 Jan 2026cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The anticipated positive social impact of regulatory processes requires both the accuracy and efficiency of their application. Modern artificial intelligence technologies, including natural language processing and machine-assisted reasoning, hold great promise for addressing this challenge. We present a framework to address the challenge of tools for regulatory application, based on current state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods for natural language processing (large language models or LLMs) and formalization of legal reasoning (the legal representation system PROLEG). As an example, we focus on Article 6 of the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In our framework, a single LLM prompt simultaneously transforms legal text into if-then rules and a corresponding PROLEG encoding, which are then validated and refined by legal domain experts. The final output is an executable PROLEG program that can produce human-readable explanations for instances of GDPR decisions. We describe processes to support the end-to-end transformation of a segment of a regulatory document (Article 6 from GDPR), including the prompting frame to guide an LLM to "compile" natural language text to if-then rules, then to further "compile" the vetted if-then rules to PROLEG. Finally, we produce an instance that shows the PROLEG execution. We conclude by summarizing the value of this approach and note observed limitations with suggestions to further develop such technologies for capturing and deploying regulatory frameworks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jan 2026.

Builds on

1 of 17 references.

References · 1

  1. 2017Enabling Reasoning with LegalRuleMLcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Large Language Models as Tax Attorneys: A Case Study in Legal Capabilities Emergence
  2. 2024Rethinking Legal Compliance Automation: Opportunities with Large Language Models
  3. 2026Bridging Legal Interpretation and Formal Logic: Faithfulness, Assumption, and the Future of AI Legal Reasoning
  4. 2026Statutory AI: Aligning Large Language Models With Legal Norms
  5. 2026De Jure: Iterative LLM Self-Refinement for Structured Extraction of Regulatory Rules
  6. 2025Judging by the Rules: Compliance-Aligned Framework for Modern Slavery Statement Monitoring
  7. 2026ARCCS: An Automated Regulatory Compliance Checking System
  8. 2026The Measurement Gap in the Automation of EU Law: Benchmarking Doctrinal Legal Reasoning under the EU AI Act