mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

VeriWeave Govern: Evidence-Gated Deterministic Runtime Governance for Enterprise AI Agents

arXiv 2609.37457 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2026cs.AI cs.CY cs.MAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Enterprise artificial-intelligence agents increasingly call tools, modify infrastructure, and process protected data, creating a need to separate action generation from action authorization. This article presents VeriWeave Govern, a deterministic runtime governance layer that evaluates structured agent actions against versioned policies, validates typed evidence, applies fixed deny > review > allow precedence, routes consequential actions to accountable human review, and records replayable tamper-evident audit state. GovernBench evaluates the design over 30 independent seeds and 60,000 oracle-labelled cases spanning five enterprise domains, adversarial evidence, out-of-distribution actions, and temporal policy evolution. VeriWeave achieves 0.9888 mean accuracy, 0.9836 macro-F1, zero observed aggregate false allows, and zero observed Governance Attack Success Rate on the evaluated cases. Six ablations show that evidence gating, deny precedence, out-of-distribution fail-safe behavior, human review, contradiction handling, and temporal replay contribute complementary safety. The deployed API additionally passes 12/12 end-to-end scenarios and a 40,040-request concurrency matrix with zero failures. A separate 150-case EU/Austria regulation-grounded evaluation uses frozen predictions and two independent blinded human annotators, who agree on all decisions. On this set, deterministic engines remain conservative, while a Gemma 4 31B comparator aligns more closely with the human consensus. The results expose a measurable safety--utility trade-off and motivate evidence-aware, replayable governance as an independent control plane for enterprise agent execution.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.

Builds on

7 of 30 references.

References · 7

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  3. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
  4. 2023LLMs Cannot Reliably Identify and Reason About Security Vulnerabilities (Yet?): A Comprehensive Evaluation, Framework, and Benchmarkscited by 97
  5. 2024Cedar: A New Language for Expressive, Fast, Safe, and Analyzable Authorization (Extended Version)cited by 34
  6. 2024Rethinking Legal Compliance Automation: Opportunities with Large Language Modelscited by 6
  7. 2024How Could Generative AI Support Compliance with the EU AI Act? A Review for Safe Automated Driving Perceptioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.