mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep Learning for Video-Based Assessment of Endotracheal Intubation Skills

arXiv 2404.11727 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2024cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is an emergency procedure performed in civilian and combat casualty care settings to establish an airway. Objective and automated assessment of ETI skills is essential for the training and certification of healthcare providers. However, the current approach is based on manual feedback by an expert, which is subjective, time- and resource-intensive, and is prone to poor inter-rater reliability and halo effects. This work proposes a framework to evaluate ETI skills using single and multi-view videos. The framework consists of two stages. First, a 2D convolutional autoencoder (AE) and a pre-trained self-supervision network extract features from videos. Second, a 1D convolutional enhanced with a cross-view attention module takes the features from the AE as input and outputs predictions for skill evaluation. The ETI datasets were collected in two phases. In the first phase, ETI is performed by two subject cohorts: Experts and Novices. In the second phase, novice subjects perform ETI under time pressure, and the outcome is either Successful or Unsuccessful. A third dataset of videos from a single head-mounted camera for Experts and Novices is also analyzed. The study achieved an accuracy of 100% in identifying Expert/Novice trials in the initial phase. In the second phase, the model showed 85% accuracy in classifying Successful/Unsuccessful procedures. Using head-mounted cameras alone, the model showed a 96% accuracy on Expert and Novice classification while maintaining an accuracy of 85% on classifying successful and unsuccessful. In addition, GradCAMs are presented to explain the differences between Expert and Novice behavior and Successful and Unsuccessful trials. The approach offers a reliable and objective method for automated assessment of ETI skills.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2024.

Builds on

19 of 41 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  5. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
  6. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,694
  7. 2015Multi-view Convolutional Neural Networks for 3D Shape Recognitioncited by 565
  8. 2015Adversarial Autoencoderscited by 364
  9. 2016Hierarchical Question-Image Co-Attention for Visual Question Answeringcited by 278
  10. 2015Stacked Attention Networks for Image Question Answeringcited by 273
  11. 2023Multimodal Deep Learningcited by 258
  12. 2016On Deep Multi-View Representation Learning: Objectives and Optimizationcited by 162
7 more
  1. 2015Ask, Attend and Answer: Exploring Question-Guided Spatial Attention for Visual Question Answeringcited by 66
  2. 2019Video-based surgical skill assessment using 3D convolutional neural networkscited by 57
  3. 2017It Takes (Only) Two: Adversarial Generator-Encoder Networkscited by 19
  4. 2020How Much Can We Really Trust You? Towards Simple, Interpretable Trust Quantification Metrics for Deep Neural Networkscited by 19
  5. 2022Video-based Formative and Summative Assessment of Surgical Tasks using Deep Learningcited by 8
  6. 2020Where Does Trust Break Down? A Quantitative Trust Analysis of Deep Neural Networks via Trust Matrix and Conditional Trust Densitiescited by 7
  7. 2022One-shot skill assessment in high-stakes domains with limited data via meta learningcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.